科考船船首和多波束导流罩线型CFD分析方法与试验验证-船舶与海洋工程专业毕业论文.docxVIP

  • 6
  • 0
  • 约6.14万字
  • 约 78页
  • 2019-05-11 发布于上海
  • 举报

科考船船首和多波束导流罩线型CFD分析方法与试验验证-船舶与海洋工程专业毕业论文.docx

上海交通大学硕士学位论文 上海交通大学硕士学位论文 万方数据 万方数据 科考船船首和多波束导流罩线型 CFD 分析方法与试验验证 摘 要 海洋科考船航行过程中,碎波、飞溅等在船首水线面附近产生大 量的气泡,水中气泡反射甚至吸收声波,干扰了科考船上多波束系统 的正常工作。 由于上述问题的存在,海洋科考船的型线设计理念不同于传统运 输船。型线设计既要降低船身阻力,又要减少下泄至多波束导流罩底 部的气泡数目。阻力性能和防气泡性能是评判型线优劣的最主要的两 条标准。根据这两条标准,本文提出一种科考船船首和多波束导流罩 线型 CFD 分析方法。该方法具体为:使用 CFD 技术预报实船阻力性能; 采用流线分析法,预报线型的防气泡性能。 应用上述分析方法,本文以通用计算流体力学软件 FLUENT 为平 台,针对垂直首和小球首、突出式导流罩和平底导流罩两组科考船线 型特征,进行了数值模拟。数值模拟结果表明:垂直首的阻力值较小 球首的阻力值增加约 4%~5%。但其防气泡性能优于小球首船首。突出 式导流罩的相较于平底安装导流罩阻力增加约为 10%~11%。但其防气 泡性能优于平底导流罩。为更好的定量表达出多波束导流罩防气泡性 能的优劣,本文还提出了安全流线和安全水线的概念。本文最后对部 分线型进行船模试验。试验结果与 CFD 结果吻合良好,验证了此种 CFD 分析方法的工程实用性。 关键词:科考船;多波束;导流罩;CFD;气泡;流线 I CFD ANALYTICAL METHOD AND EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION FOR THE HEAD AND THE FAIRING OF MULTI-BEAM ECHO SOUNDER ON RESEARCH VESSEL ABSTRACT During the esearch vessel’s voyage, waves and splash generate a lot of bubbles near the waterline. The bubbles that flow to the bottom of the fairing of multi-beam echo sounder scatter or even absorb sound waves, which brings adverse effects. Given the problem, the concept of profile design of research vessels is different from traditional carriers. Hull resistance and the number of bubbles are both should be taken into account during the profile design. Resistance performance and anti-bubble performance are the two most important criteria to judge the profile. According to the two criteria, we propose a novel and practical CFD analysis for the profile of the head and the fairing on research vessels. Calculate the real ship resistance by numerical simulation to forecast resistance performance. Forecast anti-bubble performance with the streamline method. This paper use FLUENT as a platform to complete the numerical simulation. The vertical head and the bow head as well as the protruding fairing and the flat fairing are all analyzed with the method this paper proposed. Simulation results show that the resistance of the vertical head has a increment about 4% to 5% compared with the bow head. But its anti-bubble performance is be

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档