阐释运作四步骤与译者主体性分析以许渊冲和杨宪益、戴乃迭《离骚》英译本为例.docVIP

阐释运作四步骤与译者主体性分析一一 以许渊冲和杨宪益、戴乃迭《离骚》英 译本为例 李颜伟武千茹范成功 天津大学外国语言与文学学院 摘要： 比较研究可见，许渊冲版和杨宪益、戴乃迭版的《离骚》英译本在翻译手法上迥 异，乂在译文效果上殊途同归;双方对译者主体性的适度发挥使中华艺术瑰宝在 西方文化语境下焕发出新的生命力。从阐释运作理论来看，两译本在“信 任”“侵入”“吸收”及“补偿”四步骤屮均以充分发挥译者主体性为共识， 但在具体翻译策略上呈现出鲜明差异。双方在建立译者-文本合作关系后都采纳 信息补出策略:一是添加自身对原诗含义、历史背景与原作者悲苦心境的诠释； 二是通过增加定语和修饰成分来实现物象含义空缺的文化补偿。但许译严守原诗 结构，擅长直译和归化译法。杨、戴夫妇更青睐异化方式，打破了原诗格律。 关键词： 乔治?斯坦纳;翻译四步骤;《离骚》译本;译者主体性;比较研究; 作者简介：李颜伟（1967—）,女，天津人，副教授，博士，从事美国文学与历 史文化、翻译与翻译史研究； 作者简介：武千茹（1993—）,女，山西运城人，硕士研究生； 作者简介：范成功（1981—）,男，天津人，讲师。 收稿日期：2017-05-04 基金：天津市哲学社会科学研究规划项目（TJWWWT16-012） Fourfold Hermeneutic Motion and Analysis of Translators Subjectivity Viewed from Xu Yuanchong and Yang Xianyi s Versions of Li Sao LI Yan-wei WU Qian-ru FAN Cheng-gong School of Foreign Languages and Literature, Tianjin University; Abstract： A comparative study of two English versions of Li Sao translated separately by Xu Yuanchong and Yang Xianyi, Dai Naidie shows that, by adopting different translalion skills, they both achieved satisfactory effect in conveying the meaning and style of the original text. Both sides exercised their subjectivity properly, through which Chinese cultural treasure was able to be reborn under the western cultural contexts. In the view of hermeneutic motion of trust, aggression, incorporation and resti tut ion, the three translators saw proper subjectivity as their principles. Nevertheless，they were different from each other in specific translation strategics. After establishing the translator-text cooperation, all of them chose to make some supplement towards their translations: adding their own comprehension to the original5 s implicat ion, historical background and so on, or adding attributes and modifiers to fill the cultural vacancy. In this process, Xu strictly adhered to the st rue turc of the original by utilizing the rhyme of abab and preferred literal translation plus domestication. In contrast, Yang and Dai preferred foreignization and they broke the original rhyme and adopting that of aabb