律师庭外慎言义务分析-法学专业毕业论文.docx

律师庭外慎言义务分析-法学专业毕业论文.docx

  1. 1、本文档共36页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
1 1 2 2 Abstract Lawyers have the right to publish speeches out of court,which is the effective way to safeguard legitimate rights of the parties,protect the publics right to know and supervise the fair judgment of the court.Meanwhile,part of the speech out of court is a kind of litigation strategy designed for obtaining the advantage position of the litigation.But some lawyers express their speeches on the cases of greater concern without bottom line,which seriously violated the right of personality of litigation parties and their close relatives and the right of criminal defendants to receive a fair trial,interfered the independent judgment of the court,and harmed the individuals and the society.A lawyer should be self-discipline,and should exercise caution in speech out of court. The first part of this paper is the discussion of the connotation and theoretical basis of the lawyers’ speech out of court.The connotation of the lawyers’ speech out of court is definite from the perspective of identification,space and time and method.Lawyers’ speech out of court is a reflection of exercising their right to free speech,and have vital function of supervising and restricting the judicial power.It’s a legitimate source of lawyers’ out-of-court speech. The second part is the legal analysis of the obligation of caution in speech for the lawyers.First,it introduced the reason of the vast existence of lawyers’ speech out of court in the social focus cases.Then,combined with the“Yao Jiaxin intentional murderer case”,“the rape case involving Li and other four person”and the relevant cases,analyze the damage caused by the improper lawyers’ speech out of court to the public interest(judicial independence and lawyer profession image),private interest(fair trial rights and right of personality of the defendants),and concluded that lawyers should exercise caution in speech out of court. The third part is to sort the standards of obligation of caution in speech for the lawyers in Chin

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

peili2018 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档