论律师伪证行为的刑法规制.pdfVIP

摘 要 我国刑法第306 条 “律师伪证罪”仍然是悬在律师头上的一把 “利剑”，规定了 在刑事诉讼过程中，辩护人毁灭、仿造证据，帮助当事人毁灭、仿造证据，威胁引诱 证人作伪证的，处以刑罚。其中对于律师伪证罪存在否定、肯定之说两种观点。新的 刑事诉讼法对律师执业权利空间有较大改善，与此同时第42 条亦认可刑法第306 条 律师伪证行为，其中律师伪证行为与一些新法下的律师辩护行为容易重合。因此，有 必要切合实际对律师“伪证行为”进行刑法规制，采取实际之办法“存而规制”的原 则，通过完善，使得律师伪证行为更详细、规范、具体和明确。 律师伪证罪主要存在的缺陷为帮助罪状的模糊状态、引诱罪状的模糊状态和主观 故意难以认定，律师尽职辩护的另一层面即认为律师涉嫌了律师伪证罪，具有理解上 的双重性，由于行为人主观“直接”、“间接”故意不容易分辨，仅凭司法部门办案 人员主观判断，律师容易被侦控部门 “职业报复”追责，究其原因恰恰是因为界限模 糊。这样实际也造成了伪证行为条款的被轻易滥用，同时举出了李庄被定伪证罪追责 的案例。对律师伪证行为现有存在的缺陷，最好之办法即对行为进行刑法规制。通过 完善制度使得到立法上过渡，其中包括对帮助罪状进行详细界定，对引诱罪状进行详 细界定，帮助和引诱均可作扩大解释、限制解释，明确刑法所要调整之具体范围，以 及明确律师执业中的伪证行为、合理避险和依法辩护的界限，对情节严重情形制定具 体司法解释。 关键词：律师伪证行为；刑法规制；缺陷；完善 I Abstract The article 306 of criminal law in our country which called “The perjury of lawyer” is still a sword hanging on the head of lawyers. It was ruled in the process of criminal procedure, said that defender destroying and faking evidence, helping the parties to destroy and fake evidence, threatening and tempting the witness to perjure is need to be punished. There are negative theory and positive theory on the perjury of lawyer, and putting forward the necessity of the criminal law regulation on the behavior of lawyers’ perjure, thinking that the new law of criminal procedure improve the right of lawyers’ practice. At the same time, on the condition of recognize the article 306 of criminal law, taking the actual measures, regulating lawyers’ perjure under the principle of “storage and regulation”, it can make this article standard, specific and clear. The defect of the lawyers’ perjury is the fuzzy state of helping and tempting behavior, and the subjective proof is hard to identify. On the other view, lawyers responsible defense is maybe regard as a lawyer’s perjure behavior. Because it’s diffic