论积极住房权的司法救济-法律专业论文.docxVIP

山东大学硕士学位论文结 山东大学硕士学位论文 结 语 27 参考文献 28 致{射 32 万方数据 山东大学硕士学位论文CONTENTS 山东大学硕士学位论文 CONTENTS Abstract ．． ．1 Introduction ． ．．1 1．The characters of the positive right to housing． ． ．3 1．1 differences between positive fight and negative fight 3 1．2 the positive fight to housing is legitimate 5 1．3 two kind ofjudicial remedy ifthe positive fight to housing．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．6 2．The basis of the judicial remedy of the positive right to housing 9 2．1 the national obligations in the positive fight to housing 9 2．2 the fallacy that positive right to housing is unjudicial 10 2．3 the significance of judicial remedy for the positive fight to housing．．．．．．．．．．．．1 1 3．The outside practice of judicial remedy of the positive right to housing 1 3 3．1 indirect judicial remedy 13 3．1．1 to extend the scope ofthejudicial remedy 13 3．1．2 due process ofjudicial remedy 14 3．2 quasi judicial remedy ． ．．15 3．3 direct judicial remedy ．． 。16 4．The condition of the judicial remedy of positive right to housing in our country 1 8 4．1 The lack in the constitution 18 4．2 The problems in law and policies ．． ．19 4．3 the problems of affordable housing and low—rent housing 20 4．4 the problems of housing fight convention 21 5．The construction of the judicial remedy of the positive right to housing．．．．．．．．．．．．23 5．1 public interest litigation ．．_． 23 5．2 expanding the fights of the constitution by interpretation 24 5．3 setting up DALO ．． ．． ··24 5．4 guarantee citizens’fight to know by judicial remedy 25 万方数据 山东大学硕士学位论文Conclusion 山东大学硕士学位论文 Conclusion 27 References．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．：18 Acknowledgement 32 万方数据 山东大学硕士学位论文摘要 山东大学硕士学位论文 摘要 积极住房权是一项社会性权利，其源于《经济、社会和文化权利公约》以及《世 界人权宣言》，由于受欧洲二分法的影响，该权利并没有受到应有的重视，而且也缺 乏行之有效的司法救济手段。鉴于其权利地位以及可诉性仍然存在争议，为了改变这 种状况，笔者选择积极住房权的司法救济作为研究对象。笔者认为虽然积极住房权是 一项社会权，但其不同于一般意义上的的社会权，其事