论计算机字库中单字的著作权保护-法律（法学）专业论文.docxVIP

An An Analysis on the Copyrights Protection of Single Character of Computer Font Postgraduate：Liu xiayi Tutor：Chen zongbo Grade：2014 Major：Master of Law Research Direction：l Intellectual property law Abstract With the development of science and technology,new problems emerge in the field of intellectual property protection．Online download of songs，videos about five years ago till today’S computer font infringement，all have caused heated discussion． Computer font should be subject to the”Copyright Law”Protection has been widely recognized by the judiciary circle，especially by local courts．But whether a single character should be protected by the”Copyright Law”is still controversial both in theory and practice． China‘S current”Copyright Law”system hasn’t clearly defined the originality and belonging of single character of the computer font．Nowadays，the discussions about single character of computer南nt focus on the legal property,i．e．the originality and aesthetic meaning bom in theory and practice．In addition，whether it will do harm to the public interest is the focus of debate．rnle unclear law,controversial opinion， practical chaos are unfavorable to protect the single character．I believe that it is necessary that the clarification of law attributes of single character to build its reasonable protection mode．T11is article reviews the practice of two classic Cases： Founder VS ProcterGamble and Hanyi VS Shuangfei Ltd．and Prince Fog company and summarize meir controversy and analyzeⅡleir legal attributes。then come to an conclusion that single character of computer font should be protected by”copyright law”． In this paper，in addition to introduction and conclusion，it is divided into six parts． 11le first part is question，through the practice of the two classic case：Founder VS ProcterGamble and Hanyi VS Shuangfei Ltd．and Prince FcIg company,and the author will sum up different views，such as whether the single character of computer font has originality,aesthetic sense，or