刘宝楠《论语正义》征引皇《疏》、邢《疏》校勘-中国古典文献学专业论文.docxVIP

I I 摘 要 清人刘宝楠的《论语正义》在文献学上的意义重大，保存了汉代至清代丰富的《论语》 注疏文献。该书征引梁代皇侃《论语集解义疏》和宋代邢昺《论语注疏》材料较多，而存 在的问题也较多，以致后人引用时以讹传讹，积弊愈来愈深，因此对其进行校勘，具有很 大的学术意义。 本文的校勘，皇侃《论语集解义疏》采用鲍廷博《知不足斋丛书》本（台湾艺文印书 馆印行严灵峰主编《无求备斋论语集成》影印），邢昺《论语注疏》采用北京大学出版社 出版的李学勤主编《十三经注疏》竖排标点整理本，刘宝楠《论语正义》采用中华书局出 版的以清同治五年初刻本为底本的高流水点校本。通过刘氏《正义》与皇《疏》、邢《疏》 的对校，发现刘氏《正义》在征引皇《疏》、邢《疏》材料方面，存有严重的不忠实皇《疏》、 邢《疏》的问题。归纳起来，问题主要类型有五：一脱文，二衍文，三讹误，四改易（含 纠误、改用同义近义字、异体字和通假字），五删节，另外还出现一些刘氏对皇《疏》、邢 《疏》完善修饰之处，比如紧缩和语序调整，但在引用中不忠实于原文，亦容易给文献造 成混乱。故本文采用表格的形式对校，明晰展示三本之间文字内容的差异。问题的五种主 要类型，分为七组表格，每个表格之后，对本类型的问题进行客观分析，举例探究造成这 类问题的严重性及原因。 通过比勘，本文发现刘氏《正义》脱文 33 处，衍文 12 处，讹误 22 处，改易 63 处， 删节 56 处。将这些问题校理清楚，有助于广大《论语》研读者在使用刘氏《正义》材料 时，态度谨慎，征引正确。 关键词：《论语》；刘氏《正义》；皇《疏》；邢《疏》；校勘 II II Abstract LiuBaonan’s LunYuZhengYi is significant in Philology,which saves rich Analects Commentaries literature from Han Dynasty to Qing Dynasty.The book quotes many content from LunYuJiJieYiShu of HuangKan in Liang Dynasty and LunYuZhuShu of XingBing in Song Dynasty.However at the same time, there exists many quoting problems that may mislead the future generations.Therefore, the proofreading of LunYuZhengYi has great academic meaning. About the proofreading HuangKan’s LunYuJiJieYiShu uses BaoTingbo’s ZhiBuZuZhai Series Edition by Taiwan Art Book Printing Museum publishing YanLingfeng editors WuQiuBeiZhaiLunYuJiCheng Photocopy Edition.XingBing’s LunYuZhuShu uses Peking University Press Li Xueqin chiefly edits ShiSanJingZhuShu Vertical Punctuation Arrangement Edition.LiuBaonan’s LunYuZhengYi uses the first edition in Qing Dynasty TongZhi five years by Zhonghua 1990 Punctuation GaoLiushui Proofreading Editon.Through the comparison of three books, I find Liu’s seriously infides Huang’s and Xing’s in reference materials.To sum up, there are five major problems: lost, redundant, wrong, transform and abridge. Also there are many modification like tightening and adjustment of the words order.This article uses forms to show clear differences among three books.Five main problems will be divided into