立体商标合理使用的边界-法学专业论文.docxVIP

中文摘要中文摘要 中文摘要 中文摘要 我国2001年对商标法进行修改，将立体商标(三维标志)纳入了《商标法》 的保护范围。立体商标不同于普通的二维商标，其在注册上除需要具有显著性外， 还需要具有非实用功能性以及非美学功能性的限制性要件。但是我国《商标法》 却没有规定非实用功能性以及非美学功能性的概念以及认定标准，使得在司法实 践中据以判断立体商标合理使用的边界也很模糊，难以做出准确的认定。而且由 于立体商标所具有的特殊性使得其容易与外观设计专利权以及产品包装权产生冲 突，而这些冲突的界限就是立体商标合理使用的边界。因此，笔者认为我们要想 准确的界定立体商标合理使用的边界，就必须得研究立体商标显著性、非实用功 能性以及非美学功能性的边缘界限以及冲突的界限并针对这些边缘界限找到立体 商标合理使用的一般标准和特殊标准，以确定立体商标合理使用的界限。 关键词：立体商标；合理使用；界定；冲突 万方数据 黑龙江大学硕士学位论文Abstract 黑龙江大学硕士学位论文 Abstract Before 2001 revised trademark law,trademark law in our country is not the protection of stereoscopic trademarks，to protect themselves before the operator specific unique personality appearance or packaging goods，often through application design approach．However as a patent of appearance design of kind of its protection period is limited，SO dont like a trademark obtain relatively permanent protection．So in order to expand the scope of the protection of trademark rights people，our country of trademark law modified in 2001，the stereoscopic trademarks(3 d)included in the scope of the protection of the trademark law．But at the same time there is a problem，because our country there no rules and registered trademark in the trademark law,the reasonable system，three—dimensional trademark ho lder may appear abused its trademark rights，in the rational use of the three-dimensional trademark others．But a kind of stereoscopic trademark as registered trademark，it will inevitably involve the use of the boundary question，when using the stereoscopic trademarks trademark holder can’t harm others prior right，cannot limit non-commercial use，others more cant prevent others in confused way using the stereoscopic trademarks．Our country in 20 1 3 the newly revised”trademark law” provisions of the first rules of unavailability, but not discussed with the establishment of reasonable system，which makes the author felt very sorry．The author thinks that，according to the present of our country economy development degree and in the judicial practice of a large nu