论民事赔礼道歉责任-法学专业论文.docxVIP

摘 摘 要 I I 摘 要 《中华人民共和国民法通则》（以下简称《民法通则》）将赔礼道歉作为民 事责任承担方式之一，意味着赔礼道歉完成了从道德范畴到法律范畴的转变， 而强制力就是其法律性的体现。赔礼道歉因法律制度的规定而具有强制力，因 诉讼中法官的判决而具有强制力，若不履行判决，法院可以强制其执行，即因 强制执行而具有强制力。然而长久以来，我们并没有对这种法律化了的责任承 担方式进行普遍深入的研究，致使赔礼道歉出现法律制度结构不完善，实践应 用难等问题。现代社会崇尚和谐，呼吁节约诉讼资源，赔礼道歉如果能被法律 所用，将能发挥其更大更积极的作用。不仅能在金钱之外给予受害人精神创伤 的精神补救，亦能通过避免将纠纷激化为诉讼来有效的节约司法资源。因此， 探讨如何在法律中构建赔礼道歉的相关制度，解决赔礼道歉在实践中的相关问 题就显得尤为重要。 本文将分为以下几个部分进行论述。首先文章对赔礼道歉责任进行概述。 即从赔礼道歉责任的内涵，到赔礼道歉责任的特征，最后到赔礼道歉责任的功 能这三个方面进行阐述，从而对赔礼道歉有一个全面的了解。其次本文论述了 民事赔礼道歉责任在立法与司法适用上存在的问题。文章先列明现今法律对赔 礼道歉的规定，从而引出因法律制度规定的模糊引发了司法适用上的问题。最 后文章在提出问题的基础上对完善民事赔礼道歉责任制度做出了一些建议。如 通过最高院司法解释的方式使赔礼道歉责任更加准确的适用，在执行过程中对 我国的强制登报制度进行完善，最后可以建立自愿赔礼道歉的激励制度，这样 既能达到要求侵权人赔礼道歉的目的，也能促进社会的和谐。 关键词： 民事责任 赔礼道歉 强制登报 Ab Abstract III III Abstract General Principles of Civil Law of the PRC (hereinafter referred to as the general principles of the civil law) takes apologize as one of the ways to undertake the civil liabilities. Which means apologize has completed the conversion from the moral realm to the legal category. Force is the embodiment of the law. Apology has force for the provisions of the legal system. It has force due to the judges decision. If you do not comply with the judgment, the court may compel the enforcement, in another word, it has force for enforcement. However, we did not make a deeper study on this responsibility which result in the legal system is not perfect. It is important to discuss how to construct the system of apology in law and solve the problems related to apologize in practice. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part is introduction. In the second part, the author make a summary of apologize. The article make a state from the connotation of apologize, then the duty characteristic and the function of the responsibility to apologize, last make a comprehensive understanding to apologize. In the third part, the author lists the civil liability system of the present situation and existing problems. This article expounds from two aspects of legislati