论被监护人的侵权民事责任-法律专业论文.docxVIP

1011111: Uf 1UiJU胡2 摘要 摘要 我国现行立法关于被监护人侵权民事货任的规定主要在《民法通则》第 133 条和《侵权责任法》第 32 条中。尽管《侵权责任法》是今年 7 月才实施的，但 是对于被监护人侵权民事责任的规定，立法者 3基本采用了《民法通贝 Ij}}第 133 条做法，只是删除了单位担任监护人的特殊规定。这些规定本身存在许多问题， 矛盾蠢蠢，没能合理的区分监护人和被监护人的各自责任。 本文从我因被监护人侵权民事责任制度的立法缺陷入手，通过理顺民事行 为能力、民事权利能力和民事责任能力三者之间的关系，尝试重新分配监护人 与被监护人各自的民事责任。本文认为，民事责任能力与民事行为能力无关， 民事责任能力属于民事权利能力的范畴。一切自然人包括无民事行为能力人和 限制民事行为能力人都具有民事责任能力。无民事行为能力人因为缺乏意思能 力，无法承担过错责任。限制民事行为能力人在实施侵权行为时，如果具有认 识其责任所必要的理解力，则要承担过错责任，反之，不承担。监护人只承担 过错责任。被监护人在监护人无过锚的情况下，要承担公平责任，但此时，如 果被监护人没有经济能力承担民事赔偿责任的，监护人要承担垫付责任，监护 人履行垫付责任后可以向被监护人边偿。 关键词z 侵权行为:行为能力:责任能力:权利能力:归责原则 ABSTRACT ABSTRACT ηle Article 133 of General Principles of The Civil Law of The Peoples Republic ofChina and the Article 32 ofTort Law of The Peoples Republic ofChina include Contents that who should undertake the responsibility when the damages made by person under 部wdianship. These laws 缸e quite similar. They are self-contradictory，because 由ey 缸e not distinction the responsibility into the guardianship. These laws have their defecωin legislative design. This text analyze the question whether person under guardianship have responsibility，and try to p川 forward question ωthe tradition theories. Then it points out the problem 制nong 由em. 白山 text concluded 由at everyone have capacity for civil liability，just as the capacity for civil rights. People without civil capacity because of lack of capacity means the ability and capacity identify 由.e ability; he cant bear the responsibility for mistakes. When the person wi伽 limited capacity for civil conduct is at fault，he should bear the responsibility for the damage caused by him. When the 职wdian is at fault，he should bear the responsibility for the damage caused by person under guardianship. When the 肌矶时ian is no fault， person under 肌mrdianship should bear the equitable responsibility. When person under guardianship should take responsibility二 but he has no property or asserts sufficientωtake full responsibility，the guardian should advance human responsibilit