论我国民事审前准备程序中法官释明权的行使-诉讼法专业论文.docxVIP

I I 摘 要 审前准备程序能够保证庭审公正而有效进行，避免诉讼延迟。法官释明权的 行使有利于引导诉讼的有序有效进行，实现诉讼公正和效率。无论是审前准备程 序还是法官释明权，它们的存在都是为了能够更好地促进民事诉讼目的的实现。 我国目前正在向协同主义模式转型，协同主义模式是指在民事诉讼中，充分 发挥法官与当事人之间的积极作用，由法官与当事人之间以及当事人相互之间协 同推进民事诉讼的一种诉讼模式。只有在协同主义模式下，审前准备程序中法官 释明权才能充分发挥作用。因此，随着我国诉讼模式的转型，建立审前准备程序 的法官释明权具有现实必要性。 民事审前准备程序法官释明权的行使应坚持必要和适度原则、探求当事人真 意原则以及符合程序正义和实质正义原则。在行使的主体方面应坚持庭审法官与 准备法官的分离，这种分离应主要适用于普通程序。审前准备程序中释明权的行 使的内容主要包括两个方面：对诉讼请求的释明和对证据资料的释明。当发生不 当释明时，当事人有权获得救济，当事人享有提出异议权和上诉权，以及损失赔 偿请求权。 要建立民事审前准备程序中的法官释明权，还必须要确立相应的辅助措施， 包括完善审前准备程序，对审前程序释明权进行立法完善以及提高法官素质，加 快法官职业化进程。 关键词：民事诉讼 审前准备程序 法官释明权 协同主义 II II ABSTRACT The pre-trail preparation procedure can guarantee the court hearing is fair and effectiveness, and avoid the procedure will be hung up. Judge’s power to clarify is advantage to direct the civil procedure and carry out fair and efficiency. Either the pre-trail preparation procedure and judge’s power to clarify are both in order to achieve the goal of civil procedure. Our country is changing the mode of civil procedure to principle of cooperation. It refers a mode of civil procedure that judge and parties or among parties to promote procedure in common. And only under the mode of principle of cooperation, judge’s power to clarify could bring into play it’s role plenary in the prepare procedure before trial. So, to establish the power to clarify of judge has realistic meaning in the pre-trail preparation procedure with the change of our country’s procedure mode. To exercise judge’s power to clarify of judge in the pre-trail preparation procedure should insist on the principle of necessary and moderate, the principle to reach the truth mean of parties, the principle to keep with the justice of procedure and substance. In the aspect of main body should insist the separation of court hearing judge and preparation judge and this separation mainly apply to the common procedure. The main content that the civil procedure in the pre-trail preparation procedure include that to clarify about lawsuit req