论第三人对合同缔结的妨害民法学专业论文.docxVIP

内 内容摘要 1 1 论第三 论第三人对合同缔结的妨害 本文分析了合同尚未生效，交易双方处于合同缔结关系时，该关系受到第三人妨害 的情形。本文通过对现行法律的总结，判断出我国目前对该种现象并没有完善的保护措 施，进而分析并得出结论，认为应当在侵权法的框架下对第三人进行规制，保护合同缔 结双方的利益。 本论文分为三个部分： 第一部分探讨了合同缔结中的法益，其中分为三个层次，分别分析了合同缔结中有 没有值得保护的民法利益、该利益是否已经被现行法律所保护以及若尚未被保护则该由 何种民法领域进行保护。对于第一点，通过对宏观层面和微观层面的分析并考察中外多 种学说，笔者认为合同缔结中存在一种信赖利益，该信赖利益由财产利益和机会利益构 成；对于第二点，通过对现行民法的考查，特别是对缔约过失责任和第三人侵害债权的 考查，笔者认为目前我国民法体系中对合同缔结并没有明确的保护手段；对于第三点， 通过对该法益的进一步分析，笔者认为应该在侵权法的体系内进行保护。 第二部分探讨了国外保护合同缔结、排除第三人妨害的相关情况，其中又分为两个 方面，第一个方面考查了英美法系国家，第二个方面考查了大陆法系国家，通过对两大 法系的代表性国家的法条和判例的分析，归纳总结了国外对合同缔结双方的保护制度及 原因，以期给我们国家的相关制度建设给予借鉴。 第三部分探讨了如何构建我们国家的排除第三人妨害合同缔结制度，该部分根据侵 权法的原则，从时间跨度、主观过错、行为、归责原则、损害、因果关系、免责事由这 七个方面进行了分析，并结合我国的实际情况进行了补充和完善。 关键词：合同缔结；第三人；信赖利益；侵权责任 Abs Abstract 1 1 论第三 论第三人对合同缔结的妨害 This paper analyzes the contract has not concluded, both parties in the contracting relations, was the third person disrupt case, through the summary to the existing law, judge the current situation and not for this perfect protection measures, and analyzes and concludes that in tort law shall be under the framework of the third person to governing, protect the contract concluded the interests of the party. This paper is divided into three parts: The first part is the study of the law benefit concluded contract, which is divided into three parts, analyzes the contract concluded have worthy of protection interests of civil law, the benefit is has been protected by the current law, if not by what should protect the civil law field. On the first argument, through the macro and micro level of analysis, a visit to the Chinese and foreign many theory, contract concluded that there is a trusty interest, by property interests and opportunity benefit form; For the second point, through to the current civil law examination, especially to the contracting negligence liability and the third person of the creditors rights violated the examination, think that at present our country civil law and no clear protective methods; For the third point, through the share of t