论抢夺罪中的抢夺行为刑法学专业论文.docx

PAGE PAGE IV III III Abstract The theory of seizing behavior will directly determine whether a particular act can be identified as the crime of forcible seizure, which is related to boundaries of the crime and the non-crime, this crime and that crime. The etymological meaning of seizing has a major difference with the current criminal meaning. Seizing behavior is difficult to distinguish with theft behavior and robbery behavior because of similarity, which makes the controversial definition of seizing behavior in theory. Seizing behavior requires openly conduction except the non-preparation. The special behavior of seizing with driving can not be all identified as seizing behavior, because specific solution depend on specific situations. The objects of seizing behavior is widespread, including movable and immovable properties, physical properties and property interests, legal and illegal properties, worth and worthless properties. To accurately define the seizing behavior, it needs to clear the boundary between seizing behavior and robbery behavior. Seizing behavior is using the violent method to seize the property which is the possession of others, while theft behavior is using the peaceful method to hold the property belonging to others. Extorting behavior only to be restricted in the threat, implements the violence not on the scene, but robbery behavior is uses the force to capture other people belongings on the scene. Key words: seizing behavior; crime of seizing; concept; behavior structure; identifying 目 录 第 1 章 引 言 1 1.1 选题依据 1 1.2 研究现状 1 1.3 研究思路与方法 2 1.4 本文拟解决的问题 2 第 2 章 抢夺行为的概念 3 2.1 词源意义上的抢夺的概念 3 2.2 刑法意义上的抢夺的概念 3 2.2.1 境内外刑法对抢夺行为的规定 3 2.2.2 我国刑法学界对抢夺行为的界定 5 2.2.3 本文对抢夺行为的界定 6 第 3 章 抢夺行为的构造 9 3.1 抢夺行为的方式 9 3.1.1 抢夺行为方式的理论之争 9 3.1.2 抢夺行为方式的界定 10 3.2 抢夺行为的对象 12 3.2.1 关于抢夺行为对象的理论之争 13 3.2.2 抢夺行为对象的界定 16 第 4 章 抢夺行为的认定 18 4.1 抢夺行为与抢劫行为的界限 18 4.2 抢夺行为与敲诈勒索行为的界限 23 4.3 抢夺