论绝对新颖性存在的现实基础及有效措施.pdfVIP

absolutely novelty. This point can be proved from two respects: First, hi-tech ovation capacity has been improved by a large margin comparing with the past. Second, Chinese patent quality (especially the patent of invention) can not meet the demands of developed countries. Secondly, it indicates further that standard of absolutely novelty fulfills Chinese reality now. This point can be proved from two respects: First, prove the point from comparing Chinese and Japanese reality in putting standard of absolutely novelty to use. Second, there is no positive connection in adopting standard of absolutely novelty between America and China. At last, it points out it is helpful to protect domestic enterprises if we adopt standard of absolutely novelty. This part is an important point next in importance, It proves that Chinese hi-tech ovation capacity has been improved by a large margin from comparing the amount of patent application in China in recent years with that in the past. About the problem of the bad quality of patent in China, it can be analyzed from two aspects: First, compare the quality with the amount of Chinese valid patent. Second, the hold time of foreign valid patent is twice as much as that of internal valid patent. The amount of term of validity of patent up to ten years in foreign countries is six times as much as that in China. The fact proportion is more lower in China because many valid patents of invention are applied by foreign corporations or Taiwan corporations. So, when prove the point, first, draw lessons from Japan. Second, explain that there is no positive connection in adopting standard of absolutely novelty between China and which is open in foreign countries can not apply for patent in order to protect the development of Chinese medium and small-sized enterprises. Chapter four puts forwa