原创力文档- 1、本文档共5页，可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
8 1 Vol. 8 No. 1
2017 1 Journal of Food Safety and Quality Jan. , 2017
2
王利刚, 张 磊, 张 婧, 费云滟, 付莎莉, 吴 丹, 屠大伟*
(, 401121)
摘 要: 目的 mini-VIDAS 2 , 2
方法 , 3
, 3 结果 mini-VIDAS
, mini-VIDAS , 3
结论 mini-VIDAS , ,
, mini-VIDAS
关键词: ; mini-VIDAS ; ;
Comparison of traditional culture method and 2 rapid screening methods for
detection of Staphylococcus aureus
*
WANG Li-Gang, ZHANG Lei, ZHANG Jing, FEI Yun-Yan, FU Sha-Li, WU Dan, TU Da-Wei
(Chongqing Institute for Food and Drug Control, Chongqing 401121, China)
ABSTRACT: Objective To compare 2 rapid screening methods of mini-VIDAS method and membrane chip
method with the culture method in national standard, evaluating the effectiveness and feasibility of the 2 methods.
Methods Staphylococcus aureus was selected as target bacteria, the experiments were designed to test the
sensitivity, specificity and interference resistance of 3 methods, and the artificially contaminated samples were tested
simultaneously. The application effects of 3 screening methods were compared. Results The culture method in
national
文档评论（0）