- 1、本文档共27页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
对1084例真实世界里的房颤患者用不同危险分层方法进行评估 Abstract Background Contemporary clinical risk stratification schema for predicting stroke and thromboembolism(TE) in patients with atrial fibrillation(AF) are largely derived from risk factors identified from trial cohorts. Thus, many potential risk factors have not been included. Methods We refined the 2006 Birmingham/NICE stroke risk stratification schema into a risk factor based approach, by reclassifying and/or incorporating additional new risk factors, where relevant. This schema was then compared to existing stroke risk stratification schema in a ‘real world’ AF patient cohort(n=1084) from the EuroHeart Survey for AF. Results Risk categorization differed widely between the different schemes compared. Patients classified as ‘high risk’ ranged from 10.2% with the Framingham schema to 75.7% with the Birmingham 2009 schema. The ‘classical’ CHADS2 categorised the largest proportion(61.9%) into the ‘intermediate risk’ strata, whilst the Birmingham 2009 schema classified 15.1% into this category. The Birmingham 2009 schema classified only 9.2% as ‘low risk’, whilst the Framingham scheme categorized 48.3% as ‘low risk’. Calculated c-statistics suggested modest predictive value of all schema for TE. The Birmingham 2009 schema fared marginally better (c-statistic 0.606) than CHADS2. However, those classified as ‘low risk’ by the Birmingham 2009 and NICE schema were truly ‘low risk’ with no TE events recorded, whilst TE events occurred in 1.4% of ‘low risk’ CHADS2 subjects. When expressed as a scoring system, the Birmingham 2009 schema (CHA2DS2-VASc acronym) showed an increase in TE rate with increasing scores (p value for trend=0.003). Conclusion Our novel, simple stroke risk stratification schema, based on a risk factor approach, provides some improvement in predictive value for TE over the CHADS2 schema, with low event rates in ‘low risk’ subjects and the classification of only a small proportion of subjects into the ‘intermediate risk’
您可能关注的文档
- 内科学肺癌讲课课件.ppt
- 冠心病麻醉处置的若干问题.ppt
- 内科学冠心病.ppt
- 冠心病病人麻醉处置.ppt
- 冠心病医疗讲座.ppt
- 冠状动脉的正常生理和解剖.ppt
- 冠脉痉挛指南讲解.ppt
- 冲击波治疗专业知识讲座.ppt
- 凝血机制和抗凝药物的新视点.ppt
- 冠心病房颤危险评分.ppt
- 中国国家标准 GB/T 18233.4-2024信息技术 用户建筑群通用布缆 第4部分:住宅.pdf
- GB/T 18233.4-2024信息技术 用户建筑群通用布缆 第4部分:住宅.pdf
- GB/T 18978.210-2024人-系统交互工效学 第210部分:以人为中心的交互系统设计.pdf
- 《GB/T 18978.210-2024人-系统交互工效学 第210部分:以人为中心的交互系统设计》.pdf
- 中国国家标准 GB/T 18978.210-2024人-系统交互工效学 第210部分:以人为中心的交互系统设计.pdf
- GB/T 16649.2-2024识别卡 集成电路卡 第2部分:带触点的卡 触点的尺寸和位置.pdf
- 《GB/T 16649.2-2024识别卡 集成电路卡 第2部分:带触点的卡 触点的尺寸和位置》.pdf
- 中国国家标准 GB/T 16649.2-2024识别卡 集成电路卡 第2部分:带触点的卡 触点的尺寸和位置.pdf
- GB/T 17889.4-2024梯子 第4部分:铰链梯.pdf
- 《GB/T 17889.4-2024梯子 第4部分:铰链梯》.pdf
文档评论(0)