Q14英语四六级雅思托福考研GRE高考GMAT大小作文宝典策略技巧范文模板.docVIP

很多公司都同意随着受伤几率增加，员工的工资也会增加。因此，使工作环境更安全会带来财务上的好处：这样做能降低工资支出，给雇主省下一笔钱。 财务上的好处：成本； 收入 利润 etc P 降低支出 E 很多公司同意 A 工伤+ 工资+ 因此 工伤- 工资- C financial sense P=R-C 1 很多公司是哪些公司[基数]？什么类型的公司【范围变化】？ M most I 论据可以支持结论 P 错 E A大多数但是， 并不是所有 B 公司分为：特殊行业_普通行业 2 工伤概率和工资的关系？ A 无因果关系 B 其他补偿不是工资 一些工作 工伤——工资 很多岗位—— 工伤—X—工资 工资【学历、专业、时间、。。。。。】 工伤——insurance benefit 3 降低工资支出？省钱？ 省钱：[费用=工资/管理费用/财务/原材料/。。。。] 4 financial sense？【】 成本 收入 利润 1 单纯滴降工资———员工的生产力积极性———收入下降节省的成本——financial sense 就没了——目光短浅/ 非此即彼 原文：安全——降低工资——financial sense Critique： 这些方法 无法带来 financial sense The author presented a survey showing that most companies agree with the causal relationship between probability of injury and salary. This data is set to convince us that it is supportive to the final conclusion. However, this data is not countable. As we know, some co., by their nature, is bond to pay higher salaries along with a higher risk of employees injury; while there are still other co. Free from this obligation. If the survey was only focused on those high-risk co.s, the data would fail to indicate the relation between . Therefore the safety campaign would also make no sense to finance. The article went on to conclude that making workplace safer could make financial sense. This assertion implies that all cost reduction methods are no better than a safer workplace, thus this approach would certainly bring benefit to any company. The assumption is short-sighted. Consider that if employer simply cut the monthly salary of employees because the workplace is safer, man, the productivity and loyalty of those employees would be reduced dramatically. If these employees leave the company or just tend to be absent frequently, the profit of the company would shrink sharply. Therefore, the office-security campaign should be considered harmful to help the company acquire financial benefit since it ignored the long-term effect of the further cost-cutting plan.