Cretieria of 3MT英美概况——纵览·博闻.pdf

下面是三分钟学术演讲比赛的评分标准，供大家参考： 1. Comprehension and content  Did the presentation provide an understanding of the background and significance to the research question being addressed, while explaining terminology and avoiding jargon?  Did the presentation clearly describe the impact and/or results of the research, including conclusions and outcomes?  Did the presentation follow a clear and logical sequence?  Was the thesis topic, research significance, results/impact and outcomes communicated in language appropriate to a non-specialist audience?  Did the presenter spend adequate time on each element of their presentation - or did they elaborate for too long on one aspect or was the presentation rushed? 2. Engagement and communication  Did the oration make the audience want to know more?  Was the presenter careful not to trivialise or generalise their research?  Did the presenter convey enthusiasm for their research?  Did the presenter capture and maintain their audiences attention?  Did the speaker have sufficient stage presence, eye contact and vocal range; maintain a steady pace, and have a confident stance?  Did the PowerPoint slide enhance the presentation - was it clear, legible, and concise? 有缘学习更多+谓ygd3076考证资料