晟世公司Vs谭某网络主播合同纠纷案研究.pdfVIP

摘 要 本文案例选自中国裁判文书网，真实地反映了平台企业与签约主播在合同签订 和履行过程中所存在的问题，极具代表性。案件是由被告签约主播擅自单方违约引 发的原告平台企业主张违约赔偿的纠纷。平台企业为了使主播成为自己的独家签约 主播，通常会和主播签订《主播签约协议》或 《艺人合作协议》等合同。现行的法 律规范中，并没有一种有名合同与之相吻合。司法实践中，法官对相似案件的判决 结果却不相同。因此，通过案例来研究司法实践中有关《劳动法》、《合同法》等法 律在直播用工行业的适用，不仅具有理论意义，而且具有实践意义。 文章首先介绍了文章的研究背景和意义，以及国内对网络主播合同相关问题的 研究现状和论文所采用的研究方法。然后引入选取的案例，简单介绍了基本案情、 法院判决结果，以及本案的三个主要争议焦点：双方之间合同关系如何定性、被告 是否应当遵守协议中的竞业约束条款、被告应当承担违约责任的界定。并围绕案件 争议焦点的三个核心质素，从概念、理论争议以及相关立法为依据，对争议焦点问 题展开深入剖析，得出与法院判决结果完全不同的结论。最后，试探性提出规范劳 动合同关系的设定、促进网络主播的合理流动、平台权益保障的机制的若干建议， 以期能进一步规范平台企业与网络主播间合同的签订和履行，使两者相辅相成，从 而维护直播行业的稳定发展秩序。 关键词 网络主播；平台企业；合同关系；违约金；竞业限制 I Abstract The case demonstrated in this paper is selected from judgment document network of China, which is quite representative and truly reflects the problems existing in the process of signing and fulfilling the obligations of the contract between the platform enterprise and the signing anchor. The case displays a dispute that the plaintiff, the platform enterprise, claims compensation from the defendant, the anchor who unilaterally breaching the contract. In order to make anchors become their own exclusive signed anchors, platform enterprises usually sign contracts such as anchor contract agreement or artist cooperation agreement with anchors. In terms of the current legal norms, there is no typical contract consistent with the contracts mentioned above. In judicialpractice, judges present different decisions on similar cases. Therefore, it is of both theoretical and practical significance to study the application of labor law, contract law and other laws in the live-streaming-based industry in judicial practice through a case. First of all, this paper introduces the research background and significance as well a