- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Chapter 11;Links;What you will learn from this chapter;The Focus: Accounting-Based Valuation;Forecasting and the Analysis of Current Profitability;Cutting to the Core: ROCE Drivers;Due to formatting restrictions, please manually replace this page with hardcopy of slide from file: Analysis of Profitability (slide chart) [windows name]analys~1.ppt [dos name];First-Level Breakdown: Analysis of Effects of Financial Leverage (FLEV);How Financial Leverage Explains the Difference Between ROCE and RNOA;Financial Leverage:General Mills, Inc.; Microsoft Corp has been very profitable. For fiscal 1998 the firm reported an ROCE of 36.3% on average common equity of $13.702 billion. But Microsoft had no financing debt other than $980 million of convertible preferred stock. And it had considerable financial assets of $11.447 billion from cash generated from its operations. The return on average net financial assets was 8.0% (a significant portion from unrealized gains on financial assets).
?
The reported ROCE masks the profitability of operations:
The RNOA of 179.4% is weighted down by return on financing activities in the overall ROCE.
?
A What-If Question: Microsoft has regular stock repurchases. In fiscal 1998 the company used $2.796 billion of its financial assets to repurchase stock. What would the ROCE have been had it not undertaken the stock repurchase?
?
The answer:
?
With $2.796 billion more in average financial assets and common equity, the NFA to CSE ratio would have been 0.863 rather than 0.835, and the ROCE would have been:
?
31.5% = 179.4% ? [0.863 x (179.4% ? 8.0%)]
?
Stock repurchases (and dividends) increase ROCE.
?
;The Effects of Operating Liability Leverage (OLLEV);Operating Liability Leverage: General Mills, Inc.;Return on Net Operating Assets and Return on Assets;RNOA and ROA for Selected Firms, 1996;FLEV and Debt-to-Equity Ratios;Reformulated Financial Statements: Nike, Inc.;Nike, Inc.;Nike, Inc.;Reformulated Finan
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 你的态度决定你的高度主题班会.pptx VIP
- 2025-2026学年大象版(2024)小学科学一年级上册(全册)教学设计(附目录P110).docx
- T_CHATA 009—2020_肺结核患者居家治疗管理指南.pdf VIP
- 信号与系统第2版奥本海姆课后习题答案详解.pdf
- SQE供应商质量管理与工具运用.ppt VIP
- National Theatre Live: Prima Facie《初步举证(2022)》完整中英文对照剧本.docx VIP
- 机器人控制软件:Fanuc Robotics二次开发_(5).Fanuc机器人运动控制编程.docx VIP
- 2016-2023年内蒙古农业大学植物生理学考研真题.pdf VIP
- 有色金属冶炼工程建设项目设计文件编制标准.docx VIP
- 危险货物装卸软管定期检验规则.docx
文档评论(0)