- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
3. a. When more ATMs are available, money demand is reduced and the money-demand curve shifts to the left from MD 1 to MD 2, as shown in Figure 6. If the Fed does not change the money supply, which is at MS1, the interest rate will decline from r1 to r2. The decline in the interest rate shifts the aggregate-demand curve to the right, as consumption and investment increase. ? b. If the Fed wants to stabilize aggregate demand, it should reduce the money supply to MS 2, so the interest rate will remain at r1 and aggregate demand will not change. ? 6. a. Legislation allowing banks to pay interest on checking deposits increases the return to money relative to other financial assets, thus increasing money demand. ? b. If the money supply remained constant (at MS1), the increase in the demand for money would have raised the interest rate, as shown in Figure 10. The rise in the interest rate would have reduced consumption and investment, thus reducing aggregate demand and output. ? c. To maintain a constant interest rate, the Fed would need to increase the money supply from MS 1 to MS 2. Then aggregate demand and output would be unaffected. Q8. a. The initial effect of the tax reduction of $20 billion is to increase aggregate demand by $20 billion x 3/4 (the MPC) = $15 billion. The cut in taxes increases consumption spending depending on the MPC. ? b. With an MPC of 3/4, the multiplier is 1/(1-3/4) = 4. So the total effect is $15 billion x 4 = $60 billion. c. Government purchases have an initial effect of the full $20 billion, since they increase aggregate demand directly by that amount. The total effect of an increase in government purchases is thus $20 billion x 4 = $80 billion. So government purchases lead to a bigger effect on output than a tax cut does. The difference arises because government purchases affect aggregate demand by the full amount, but a tax cut is partly saved by consumers, so doesn’t lead to as much of an increase in aggregate demand. 9. a.
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 2025年医疗器械经营质量管理制度、工作程序文件目录.pdf VIP
- 浅谈小学数学核心素养之运算能力.pdf VIP
- 2023年我国蚕桑产业发展态势与未来发展建议.docx VIP
- 电力变压器声纹检测技术导则.docx VIP
- 调度员考核管理细则梳理.docx VIP
- 《建设工程施工合同》GF2024—0201.docx VIP
- 会计师事务所的执业质量控制制度.pdf VIP
- 2021《森林消防队伍基础设施、装备及制度建设标准》.pdf VIP
- 《水利水电工程单元工程施工质量验收评定标准-地基处理与基础工程》(SL 633-2012).pdf VIP
- (高清版)-B-T 2423.18-2021 环境试验 第2部分:试验方法 试验Kb:盐雾,交变(氯化钠溶液).pdf VIP
文档评论(0)