论我国股权质权设立制度的完善.pdfVIP

摘 要 我国股权质权的设立制度有哪些缺陷？这又该如何完善？这是本文试图解决 的问题。股权质权的设立是整个股权质押制度的核心环节，然而我国现行 《担保 法》只粗略规定股权出质适用 《公司法》有关股权转让的规定。股权出质与股权 转让是两个在内涵和外延均不同的法律概念，二者在程序上和具体办法上应有所 不同。制度的缺陷直接影 其功能的发挥，基于这种现状，本文以股票上股权的 本质 析为基础，以制度的价值取向为导向，以质权的特性为主线，试着重构我 国的股权质权设立制度。具体而言，本文 为如下三部 ： 第一章 析我国现行的股权质权设立制度。该部 首先从股权质权的标的范 围、股权质押的限制和股权质权的生效要件三个方面介绍了我国现行制度，然后 指出这些制度存在的若干缺陷。 第二章 析主要大陆法系国家的股权质权设立制度。依公司性质的不同，该 部 依次 析了股份有限公司、有限责任公司、无限公司和两合公司的股权设质。 第三章提出了完善我国股权质权设立制度的方案。该部 首先提出完善我国 股权质权设立制度的理论依据，其次 析完善股权质权制度时的价值取向，最后 指出该方案主要包括：股权质权的设立过程中强调“质物的交付（包括观念交付）”； 股权质权可 为略式质和登记质；尽量 大可设质股权的范围；完善《公司法》 中有关股东名册的规定；改正 《担保法》中股权质押合同生效要件的错误规定。 键词：股权 质权 设立 I Abstract What are the defects of establishment system of our stock ownership pledge and how should it be improved, these are the issues that this dissertation aims to solve. The establishment of stock ownership pledge is the key part of the whole stock ownership pledge，however, the current Guarantee Law only gives a rough regulation of applying rules of stock ownership transfer in Company Law in terms of stock ownership pledging. Stock ownership pledging and stock ownership transfer are two legal concepts which are different from both Intrinsic and extrinsic natures, so these concepts should differ both in procedure and specific measures. System defects have direct negative influence to its function, as far as the present situation is concerned, this article is based on the essence analysis of stock ownership, led by the value orientation of system, focused on the characteristics of pledge and tries to reconstruct China s establishment system of stock ownership pledge. Specifically speaking, this thesis has three chapters: Chapter one analyzes the current stock ownership pledge. Firstly, it introduces China s current system