《反垄断法》上经营者行政责任研究.pdfVIP

中文摘要 垄断是经营者在市场经济的自由竞争中所形成的，经营者是垄断主体。反垄断的重点 是规制经营者，其中规制经营者的责任是反垄断的重要方式之一。一部法律的最终实施效 果如何，除了依赖执法制度的实施，另一个重要的因素就是法律责任的规制是否合理。 在反垄断法律责任中，行政责任成为当前许多国家和组织规制垄断的重要法律责任。 反垄断行政责任是指违反《反垄断法》，实施垄断行为所承担的，由特定机关予以制裁的 法律后果。 从世界各国的反垄断行政责任立法上看，欧盟、日本等国际组织和国家都是采用以行 政处罚为主的制裁方式，即除了行政拆分等行政强制措施外，行政处罚重点是罚款。对此， 我国也不例外。我国反垄断立法采用“行政中心主义”以专章的形式规定了经营者的法律 责任。本文通过阐述行政责任的含义，研究其意义及主体结构、我国《反垄断法》上经营 者行政责任的现状、经营者行政责任能力的规定、经营者行政责任的类型、并重点阐述罚 款行政责任；通过以欧盟、日本和美国等国际组织和国家为例，阐述国外对经营者行政责 任的规定；介绍欧盟的延迟罚金、罚款制度和宽免制度，日本的劝告制度、课征金制度及 宽免制度和美国的司法行政责任模式等，并比照我国《反垄断法》，指出我国《反垄断法》 上经营者行政责任立法上存在的问题，并提出相应对策。 ： ： 关键词：：反垄断法、经营者、行政责任、罚款 Abstract Abstract AAbbssttrraacctt Monopoly is the operator in the market competition in the form of, is the main operator .Antitrust, the important point is that regulation operator, through the regulation of the responsibility of the operator becomes the important way of antitrust. A law of the final implementation effect how, in addition to depend on law enforcement system, the other one decisive factor is thelegal liability regulation is reasonable. On the anti-monopoly legal responsibility, administrative responsibility has become in many countries and organizations antitrust important legal liability. Anti monopoly law of the administrative responsibility refers to the anti monopoly law on administrative liability, is a violation of antitrust law, implement monopoly acts undertaken and specific organ sanction of legal consequences. From the world the anti-monopoly administrative responsibility legislation, the European Union, Japan, international organizations and countries are used mainly to administrative sanctions, except the administrative separation of administrative coercive measures, administrative punishment is a fine focus. Our country is also not excep