论反垄断纠纷的处理机制.pdfVIP

中文摘要 反垄断纠纷因其特质，不仅是域外还是我国都是由行政与司法二元机构予 以处理的，因此二者的权限分工及相互关系等机制问题的研究有助于建立科学 有效的反垄断纠纷处理机制。要研究反垄断纠纷的处理机制，首先要明确反垄 断纠纷的处理主体，然后再研究反垄断纠纷处理的具体步骤，包括反垄断纠纷 处理的执法机构、管辖以及对反垄断纠纷的执行。全文将各国对反垄断纠纷的 处理归纳为多元执法模式和行政控制执法模式，在剖析这两种模式各自的利弊 之后，提出我国的反垄断纠纷的处理主体应该多元化，这样有利于充分发挥执 法和司法的双重力量来有效的处理反垄断纠纷；反垄断纠纷的管辖应该实行共 享管辖体制，使司法资源得到合理的配置和运用；审判程序应该明确化，使反 垄断纠纷的处理能够有法可依；执行体制应该严格化，使反垄断纠纷的执行能 够得到强有力的保证。运用多种写作手法，对我国反垄断纠纷的处理提出有益 的探索和得到值得借鉴的做法，从而解决我国反垄断纠纷处理机制不明确的问 题。 【关键词】反垄断；反垄断纠纷；处理机制 I Abstract Because of its special characteristic, not only overseas but also our country settle anti-monopoly disputes both by anti-monopoly agency and the court. Solving the monopoly disputes requires deep understanding about the interaction itself. This understanding helps us to establish the scientific and effective mechanism of the settlement for anti monopoly disputes. Research on this field, we need to make clear the main body of the settlement itself, then, conducting a deeper research about concrete steps of the settlement, including law enforcement agency, jurisdiction and the implementation to the anti-monopoly disputes. Inducing the type of the settlement of settlement of anti-monopoly system from all countries, we can distinguish two types of anti- monopoly dispute; first, multi-dimensional law enforcement pattern, and the other is administrative law enforcement pattern. Analyzing and comparison those advantages and disadvantages lead us proposing that the main-body of the settlement of the anti monopoly disputes should be diversified, hence, it could effectively develop the dual function of the enforcement and justice of the set