论行政诉讼调解制度-毕业论文.doc

摘  要  我国行政诉讼法第五十条规定：“人民法院审理行政案件，不适用调解。”根 据该条规定，我国是不存在行政诉讼调解制度的。然而，调解制度的生命力并未 因为法律的权威性规定而寿终正寝，相反，却以一种非制度化的方式活跃于行政 诉讼中。学界对于我国是否应当建立行政诉讼调解制度也莫衷一是。在行政诉讼 法即将修改之际，探讨该问题具有极为重要的理论与实践意义。文章认为，在我 国建立行政诉讼调解制度不仅仅是司法效率的需要，也更基于现代行政诉讼判决 正当化的考量。司法实践中的行政案件撤诉率居高不下、超审限与执行难问题都 是对行政诉讼禁止调解之规定的质疑；服务行政理论、“合作论”等现代行政法 学理论为调解制度的建立提供了理论依据。在我国建立行政诉讼调解制度已具备 了实践基础和理论基础，修改行政诉讼法势在必行。文章从传统法学的角度对调 解进行了分析，认为以意思自治原则为前提的调解制度具有私法手段的性质，行 政诉讼中的调解属于私法纠纷解决手段在公法中的运用。但公法并不排斥合意， 并且在行政诉讼中运用调解不仅不违背公私法划分的目的，甚至还有利于公法目 的的实现。而现代公私法关系的变化——二者之间的相互渗透也为行政诉讼调解 制度的建立预留了空间。另一方面，从国际上来看，美国的法院附设调解、法国 的调解专员制度以及我国台湾地区行政诉讼法中的和解制度，都为我国行政诉讼 调解制度的建立提供了可资借鉴的经验；同时，加入 WTO 组织也对我国行政诉 讼调解制度的建立提出了外在要求。因此，我们必须打破观念的枷锁，尽快将调 解机制引入到行政诉讼中去。 关键词：行政诉讼；调解；合意 I ABSTRACT No.51 of Chinese Administrative Law says that mediation is not suitable in administrative cases.According to this, the system of mediation for administrative litigation doesn’t exist in our country. However, even under the authoritative provision of law, the life-force of the mediation system hasn’t died in its bed . The other way round, it flourish in the field of administrative litigation in an unsystem manner. And people have different opinions on whether to establish the system of mediation for administrative litigation or not. At the time of revising the Act of Administrative Litigation , it is very important to discuss this question for both theoretics and practice. This thesis considers that establishing the system of mediation for administrative litigation in our country is not only for the need of justice efficiency, but also for the consideration of the validity of judgement to the administrative litigation in modern times. The high ratio of the withdrawal of the suit ,the problem of disobeying trail time limit and the difficulty of enforcement in the justice practice are all oppugnations to the ban on mediation in administrative litigation;in the same time, the theory of administration of service and the theory of cooperating supply the theoretic gists. It has