浅论城镇民用自来水供水领域公私协力之边界.doc

论城镇民用自来水供水领域公私协力之边界 内容摘要 城镇民用自来水供水领域在推行公私协力活动之时，需要顾及到来自不同方 面的边界的限制。这种边界便是基于该事业自身性质之上的公、私部门协力活动 的范围。实务中，因为对于边界的认识不清，导致了操作中的诸多问题；理论上， 也缺乏以边界的眼光对本领域公私协力活动进行观察与分析。 如果以行政过程论的眼光对边界进行分解，可以细化为不同的“子项”。 其根植于本领域固有属性而展现的边界表现在：基于城镇民用自来水供水的 福利性、基本权关涉性以及自然垄断性的要求而使得合作不仅需在有限的幅度内 展开（公部门不得完全脱身而去），而且还需要顾及到保障性供水（尤其是对于 弱势群体）的要求这几方面之上。 其作为主要操作（参与）和规制手段的边界则体现在：不同的协力模式和不 同的私有资本比重分别对需要特许与否有不同要求和影响；“其他组织”也可以 如企业法人一样参与到特许投、竞标活动之中；设施、设备的具备性无关投标资 格的获取，将两者强行关联的行为在理论上欠缺合理性，在实践上也缺乏可行性； 协力关系中私部门主体具有自行组织建设的可能性以及特许协议中不宜约定争 议解决方式这几点之上。 至于作为公部门间接介入活动的边界，尽管我国入世后曾经承诺放松乃至放 弃对部分采取政府定价（含指导价）的公共事业的行政干预，但是综观《中国入 世承诺》、我国城镇民用自来水供水领域的法律制度以及本领域的性质，可以认 为价格担保责任模式虽产生了变动却不得放弃；实务中一直存在争议的管网私有 化问题，也具有一定可行性；不过，管网私有化在推行的同时还需要私有管网强 制使用作为间接的保障；最后，公部门特许经营权监督责任在法文本上还存在着 不当规范与适用困难的局面。 关键词：自来水；公私协力；供水；特许经营；担保责任 1 西南政法大学硕士学位论文 Abstract It should be taken into account that urban water supply under the public-private partnership mode is restricted by various situations. This boundary are the range of activities which are based on public and private sectors and the nature of the urban water supply undertakings itself. In view of the administrative process, those undertakings can be analyzed and refined into different sub-item-boundaries: Firstly, the limited co-operations is determined by the nature of urban water supply undertakings, which are characteristics of welfare, basic rights and natural monopolizations; Secondly, boundaries of controlling and manipulating are various by different sub-modes of public-private partnership and rations of private capitals; Thirdly, other organizations are able to participate the bidding; It has no relationship between acquiring bidding qualifications and having particular equipments and devices; private sectors of the PPP co-operation relationship have the right to organize constructions by themselves; Finally, it is inappropriate to settle clauses in the franchise contract. As for bondaries of indirect warranty responsibilities of public sectors, it’s should no be renounced even though join