肝细胞肝癌临床分期系统的比较.pdfVIP

2006 2 28 2 Chin JOncol, February 2006, Vol28, No. 2 # 155# # # 曲强 芮静安 王少斌 陈曙光 周立 韩凯 魏学 张宁 赵海涛 程恩成 ( CS)CLIPTN 2000 1 2003 10 107 , , CS CLIP 53 , TN CSCLIP TN , , Kaplan- eier, Log rank CS ab CLIP 0, 3 100%CS a, 12 68. 0% 51. 0%;b 1 20. 9% CLIP, 4, 1 23 57. 1%49. 9% 33. 5%, CSa TN , 3 100%; CSb, 13 83. 3% 75. 0%; TN , 13 93. 7% 77. 5% CLIPCS , CLIP; TN ; ; Com parison of d ifferent clin ical staging system s for hepatocellu lar carc inom a Q U Q iang, R UI J ing- an, WAN G Shao-bin, CH EN Shu-g uang, ZH OU L i, H AN K a,i WEI X ue, ZH AN G N ing, ZH A O H a i-tao, CH EN G E n-cheng D ep artm ent of G enera lS urg ery, P ek ing Un ion M ed ical Collag eH o sp ita,l Ch ineseA cademy of M ed ical Sc iences, P eking Un ion M ed ical Colleg e, B e ij ing 100032, Ch ina Corresp ond ing author: QU Q iang, E-ma il: q iang qu@ hotma il com A bstract O bj ective To compare the prognostic efficacy of three clinical staging systems: the Chinese system (CS), CLIP scores, and TN for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). M ethod s 107 cases diagnosed as HCC between January 2000 and October 2003 were retrospectively analyzed. Their clinical stageswere decieded on the basis of data in CLIP or Chinese staging system when theHCC diagnosis had been confirmed. Fifty-three of the 107 patients underwent surgical resection. TheTN stagewas therefore determ ined according tosurgico-pathological results. The survivalof thosepatientswith respective to different stages were analyzed and compared using Kaplan- eier curves and Log rank method. Resu lts All the patientswere followed up aftertreatment. The3-year survival rate in theCSa, b and CLIP 0 group