托福写作重点:重申立场.doc

  1. 1、本文档共2页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
托福写作重点:重申立场.doc

托福写作重点:重申立场 小马过河为大家准备了“托福写作重点:重申立场”,供各位备考托福的考生们参考使用,来提高自己的托福成绩!免费咨询电话:400-0123-267   一、重申立场   “It is difficult for people to achieve professional success without sacrificing important aspects of afulfilling personal life.”   In conclusion, given the growing demands of career on today’s professionals, a fulfilling personal liferemains possible by working smarter, by setting priorities, and by making suitable career choices.   二、重申立场+总结理由   “Since science and technology are becoming more and more essential to modern society, schoolsshould devote more time to teaching science and technology and less to teaching the arts andhumanities.”   In conclusion, schools should not devote less time to the arts and humanities. These areas of studyaugment and enhance learning in mathematics and science, as well as helping to preserve therichness of our entire human legacy while inspiring us to further it. Moreover, disciplines within thehumanities provide methods and contexts for evaluating the morality of our technology and fordetermining its proper direction.   三、让步+重申立场   “Job security and salary should be based on employee performance, not on years of service.Rewarding employees primarily for years of service discourages people from maintainingconsistently high levels of productivity.”   In the final analysis, the statement correctly identifies job performance as the single best criterionfor salary and job security. However, the statement goes too far, it ignores the fact that a cost-of-living salary increase for tenured employees not only enhances loyalty and, in the end,productivity, but also is required by fairness.   四、重申立场+引申扩展   How far should a supervisor go in criticizing the performance of a subordinate? Some highlysuccessful managers have been known to rely on verbal abuse and intimidation. Do you think thatthis is an effective means of communicating expectations? If not, what alternative should amanager use in dealing with someone whose work is less than satisfactory

文档评论(0)

zjianq + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档