股权分置改革前后高管持股和公司业绩相关性比较研究.pdfVIP

股权分置改革前后高管持股和公司业绩相关性比较研究.pdf

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
长期业绩与股价的联系,使高管付出和收益关系更紧密;第三,完善我 国高管股权激励制度,发展多种形式的股权激励,提高高管股权激励的 灵活性和效果。 关键词:高管持股,公司业绩,公司市场价值,股权分置改革 CORRELATION COMPARISON OF MANAGERIAL OWNERSHIP AND COMPANY PERFORMANCE BETWEEN BEFORE AND AFTER NON-TRADABLE SHARES REFORM ABSTRACT There was no consensus of whether or not managerial ownership could solve or ease principal-agent problem which rises from separation of ownership and management rights. As China’s not-tradable shares reform is completing, the contradictions between tradable shareholders and will be solved, and principal-agent problem between shareholders and management become more noticeable, so solutions are in hurry needed. And also, the government issued stock incentive management regulations to set rules and encourage listed companies to grant stock to their top management, and we believe that the purpose is to ease principal-agent problem. So, this paper will use China A share listed companies’ 2003, 2004 and 2006 data as sample, and use regression model, to analyze the effect of managerial ownership in two different methods. First, compare the correlation between before and after non-tradable shares reform, and the result is no significant growth. Second, test the correlation between management ownership and market value, and the result is also non-significant. There are four major reasons why correlation between management ownership and company performance and market value are not significant even after the reform. First, China corporate governance is not so good that decrease the effect of managerial ownership; second, managerial ownership is too low to incentive management; third, in early days, company

文档评论(0)

llllss930 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档