family dissolution principles - duke university.pdfVIP

family dissolution principles - duke university.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共21页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
family dissolution principles - duke university

FEMINISM AND CHILD CUSTODY UNDER CHAPTER TWO OF THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE’S PRINCIPLES OF THE LAW OF FAMILY DISSOLUTION MARGARET F. BRINIG* I. INTRODUCTION The Chief Reporter of the American Law Institute’s Principles of the Law of Family Dissolution wrote in his introduction; “Children are necessarily at the heart of any set of principles of family law.”1 My favorite chapter of the Principles is Chapter Two, entitled “Principles Governing the Allocation of Custodial and Decisionmaking Responsibilities for Children.”2 As of this writing, Chapter Two holds the distinction of being the only portion to have been adopted by a state legislature.3 While other Chapters had Reporters who were women,4 Chapter Two not only had a feminist Reporter,5 but the Copyright © 2001 by Margaret F. Brinig. * Professor of Law, University of Iowa. 1. P RINCIPLES OF THE LAW OF FAMILY DISSOLUTION: ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Chief Reporter’s Preface at xiii (Tentative Draft No. 3, Part I, 1998) [hereinafter ALI PRINCIPLES 1998]. 2. The title of the chapter, which of course does not refer to “child custody,” represents a conscious decision to “alternative language more accommodating to a continuum of residential arrangements.” ALI PRINCIPLES 1998, supra note 1, § 2.03, reporter’s notes at 53 (citing state statutes with similar terminology). The Comments to the Section note that “this substitution is intended to avoid the either-or (custody or visitation) alternatives sug

文档评论(0)

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档