- 8
- 0
- 约6.1万字
- 约 50页
- 2017-10-05 发布于贵州
- 举报
2种方案治疗小病毒性肺炎的卫生经济学分析
Health Economics Analysis between the two Therapeutic Schemes
for Childrens Virus Pneumonia
Speciality: Chinese Academy of Pediatrics
Author:Liu Haiqing
Tutor:Xing Xianghui
Abstract
Objective: To compare the clinical curative effect between the two therapeutic
schemes, traditional Chinese medicine and western medicine for Childrens Virus
Pneumonia. The curative effects were analyzed by cost-effectiveness method from the
aspect of health economics to provide an objective basis and scientific research foundation
for optimizing and popularizing the more cost-effective Therapeutic Schemes of child
virus Pneumonia.
Methods: The 120 cases of virus Pneumonia children who meet the standards were
randomly divided into two groups A and B, 60 cases in each group, respectively treated
with traditional Chinese medicine and western medicine. The improving and disappearing
time of fever ,cough,expectoration,asthma,lung rales and other symptoms and signs were
compared for both groups after treatment. The health economics indexes were analyzed by
cost-effectiveness method.
Results: In aspect of efficacy, both this two schemes could obviously improve the
clinical symptoms, The effective rate was 96.7% in group A, 85.0% in group B, the
recovery rate was 86.7% in group A, 71.7% in group B. There were significant differences
in the total curative effect of this two therapeutic schemes (P 0.05 ), group A was better
than group B. Comparison of single symptoms after treatment ,there were statistically
significant differences in aspect of cough and expectoration between the two groups (P
0.05 ), group A was better than group B. The improvment of asthma and lung rales were
with no significant
原创力文档

文档评论(0)