EST小切开联合EPBD治疗胆总管结石合并乳头旁憩室的临床分析.docVIP

EST小切开联合EPBD治疗胆总管结石合并乳头旁憩室的临床分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
EST小切开联合EPBD治疗胆总管结石合并乳头旁憩室的临床分析.doc

EST小切开联合EPBD治疗胆总管结石合并乳头旁憩室的临床分析   【摘要】 目的:探讨EST小切开联合EPBD治疗胆总管结石合并乳头旁憩室的疗效及风险。方法:选取2011年4月-2015年4月山西医科大学第一医院行内镜治疗胆总管结石合并乳头旁憩室的患者87例,其中观察组38例行乳头括约肌小切开联合乳头气囊扩张术(EPBD)取石,对照组49例行标准乳头括约肌切开术(EST)取石,观察两组取石成功率、术中碎石率及术后并发症等。结果:观察组一次性取净结石36例(94.7%),术中碎石4例(10.5%);对照组一次性取净结石47例(95.9%);术中碎石8例(16.3%),两组比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组术后高淀粉酶血症7例(18.4%),操作时间(34.05±13.60)min,对照组术后高淀粉酶血症19例(38.8%),操作时间(40.51±8.99)min,比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:EST小切开联合EPBD治疗胆总管结石合并乳头旁憩室与标准EST相比,可降低术后并发症,并缩短操作时间,是治疗胆总管结石合并乳头旁憩室安全、高效的微创方法,值得在临床工作中进一步推广。   【关键词】 胆总管结石; 十二指肠乳头旁憩室; 乳头括约肌小切开; 乳头气囊扩张术   Clinical Analysis on EST Joint EPBD for Treating Common Bile Duct Stones Combined Nipple Diverticulum/ZHU Ling-ling, ZHANG Jian-kang.//Medical Innovation of China,2016,13(04):046-049   【Abstract】 Objective: To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of EST joint EPBD for treating common bile duct stones combined nipple diverticulum. Method: 87 patients with common bile duct stones combined nipple diverticulum in the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from April 2011 to April 2015 were selected. 38 patients in observation group were treated with limited EST plus EPBD (ESBD), and 49 patients conventional EST (EST) treatment in control group. The rate of removing stone success, mechanical brokenstone, and complications was observed. Result: The rate of removing stone success of the observation group was 94.7% (36/38), and that of the control group was 95.9% (47/49). The rate of mechanical brokenstone was 10.5% (4/38), and that of the control group was 16.3% (8/49). There were no significant differences between the two groups (P0.05). The rate of complications of the observation group and control group was 18.4% (7/38) and 38.8% (19/49), and operating time was (34.05±13.60) min and (40.51±8.99) min, respectively, the differences were statistically significant (P0.05). Conclusion: Contrast to the EST joint EPBD for treating common bile duct stones combined nipple diverticulum and the standard EST, the former

文档评论(0)

lmother_lt + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档