- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
护理干预对海洛因成瘾合并HIV感染患者焦虑、抑郁的影响研究.doc
护理干预对海洛因成瘾合并HIV感染患者焦虑、抑郁的影响研究
[摘要] 目的 探讨护理干预对海洛因成瘾合并HIV感染患者焦虑、抑郁的影响。 方法 将62例海洛因成瘾合并HIV感染患者随机分为研究组和对照组,各31例。两组均给予美沙酮维持治疗,研究组同时接受1年的护理干预,比较两组的SAS、SDS评分,相关行为主要指标(漏服次数、偷食海洛因次数、有高危行为次数)的改善情况。 结果 干预1年后,研究组的SAS评分为(33.72±10.71)分,明显低于对照组的(43.72±12.72)分,SDS评分为(31.72±6.14)分,明显低于对照组的(48.82±9.12)分(P0.01);研究组的漏服次数、偷食海洛因次数、有高危行为次数分别为(0.42±0.72)、(0.38±0.83)、(0.38±0.91)次,明显少于对照组的(2.25±0.28)、(2.06±0.92)、(2.31±052)次(P0.01)。 结论 护理干预能明显改善海洛因成瘾合并HIV感染患者的焦虑、抑郁心理,可使患者增强治疗的信心,达到预期治疗的目标。
[关健词] 护理干预;海洛因成瘾;HIV感染;焦虑;抑郁
[中图分类号] R512.91 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2015)01(b)-0190-04
Research of influence of nursing intervention on anxiety,depression in patients with heroin addict complicated with HIV infection
LI Hai-yun ZHANG Yan-feng LI Shu-min YU Wei
Department of Psychiatry,the Third People′s Hospital of Luoding City in Guangdong Province,Luoding 527200,China
[Abstract] Objective To discuss the influence of nursing intervention on anxiety,depression in patients with heroin addict complicated with HIV infection. Methods 62 patients with heroin addict complicated with HIV infection were randomly divided into the study group (n=31) and control group (n=31).The two groups were given the maintenance of methadone,the study group was given the nursing intervention of one year,SAS,SDS score and the improvement of main indicators of related behavior (the time of forgetting to take drugs,steal heroin,having high-risk behavior)in the two groups were compared. Results After one year intervention,SAS sore in the study group [(33.72±10.71) points] was lower than that in the control group [(43.72±12.72) points],SDS sore in the study group [(31.72±6.14) points] was lower than that in the control group [(48.82±9.12) points] (P0.01).The time of forgetting to take drugs,steal heroin,having high-risk behavior in the study group [ (0.42±0.72),(0.38±0.83),(0.38±0.91)] was obviously fewer than that in the control group [(2.25±0.28) ,(2.06±0.92) ,(2.31±052)] respectively (P0.01). Conclusion N
文档评论(0)