硬膜外复合全麻在妇科腹腔镜手术中麻醉效果分析.docVIP

硬膜外复合全麻在妇科腹腔镜手术中麻醉效果分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
硬膜外复合全麻在妇科腹腔镜手术中麻醉效果分析   [摘要] 目的 研究硬膜外复合全麻在妇科腹腔镜手术中的麻醉效果。方法 采用回顾性分析的方法将我院120例妇科腹腔镜手术患者随机分为硬膜外复合全麻(研究组)60例,单纯全麻(对照组)60例, 分析两组术中血流动力学变化、术后苏醒时间,评价两组患者子宫松弛度。 结果 术中研究组患者血流动力学较对照组患者更平稳,诱导前两组MAP与HR基本相同(P0.05),麻醉后对照组MAP与HR均高于研究组。研究组苏醒时间显著低于对照组(P0.05);研究组(93.33%)子宫松弛度显著优于对照组(70.00%)(P0.05)。结论 硬膜外复合全麻较单纯全麻在妇科腹腔镜手术中具有较好的麻醉效果,患者术中心率、血压更平稳,子宫松弛度良好适合手术操作,术后苏醒较快。   [关键词] 单纯全麻;硬膜外复合全麻;腹腔镜手术   [中图分类号] R614 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2014)11-0067-03   [Abstract] Objective To study and explore the anesthetic effect of epidural anesthesia combining with general anesthesia in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. Methods The data of 120 patients with gynecologic laparoscopic surgery in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were randomly divided into 60 cases of the epidural anesthesia combining with general anesthesia group(the study group) and 60 cases of the single general anesthesia group(the control group). The intraoperative hemodynamic changes and postoperative awakening time of the two groups were recorded and analyzed, and the uterine relaxation of the two groups were evaluated. Results The intraoperative hemodynamic of patients in the study group was more stable than that in the control group, and the MAP and HR before anaesthesia induction of the two groups were basically same(P0.05), and the MAP and HR after anesthesia of the control group were higher than those of the study group. The awakening time of the study group was significantly lower than that of the control group(P0.05); The uterine relaxation of the study group(93.33%) was significantly better than that of the control group(70.00%)(P0.05). Conclusion Compares with the single general anesthesia, the epidural anesthesia combining with general anesthesia has better anesthesia effect in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery, more steady intraoperative heart rate and blood pressure of patients, good uterine relaxation for operation and quicker postoperative awakening.   [Key words] Single general anes

文档评论(0)

jingpinwedang + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档