98 c l m l r267- columbia law school(98 c l m l r267——哥伦比亚大学法学院)(202页).docVIP

98 c l m l r267- columbia law school(98 c l m l r267——哥伦比亚大学法学院)(202页).doc

  1. 1、本文档被系统程序自动判定探测到侵权嫌疑,本站暂时做下架处理。
  2. 2、如果您确认为侵权,可联系本站左侧在线QQ客服请求删除。我们会保证在24小时内做出处理,应急电话:400-050-0827。
  3. 3、此文档由网友上传,因疑似侵权的原因,本站不提供该文档下载,只提供部分内容试读。如果您是出版社/作者,看到后可认领文档,您也可以联系本站进行批量认领。
查看更多
Columbia Law Review March, 1998 *267 A CONSTITUTION OF DEMOCRATIC EXPERIMENTALISM Michael C. Dorf Charles F. Sabel [FNa1] Copyright ? 1998 Directors of The Columbia Law Review Association, Inc.; Michael C. Dorf, Charles F. Sabel In this Article, Professors Dorf and Sabel identify a new form of government, democratic experimentalism, in which power is decentralized to enable citizens and other actors to utilize their local knowledge to fit solutions to their individual circumstances, but in which regional and national coordinating bodies require actors to share their knowledge with others facing similar problems. This information pooling, informed by the example of novel kinds of coordination within and among private firms, both increases the efficiency of public administration by encouraging mutual learning among its parts and heightens its accountability through participation of citizens in the decisions that affect them. In democratic experimentalism, subnational units of government are broadly free to set goals and to choose the means to attain them. Regulatory agencies set and ensure compliance with national objectives by means of bestpractice performance standards based on information that regulated entities provide in return for the freedom to experiment with solutions they prefer. The authors argue that this type of selfgovernment is currently emerging in settings as diverse as the regulation of nuclear power plants, community policing, procurement of sophisticated military hardware, environmental regulation, and childprotective services. The Article claims further that a shift towards democratic experimentalism holds out the promise of reducing the distance between, on the one hand, the Madisonian ideal of a limited government assured by a complex division of powers and, on the other hand, the governmental reality characteristic of the New Deal synthesis, in which an allpowerful Congress delegates much of its authority to expert age

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

bgl001 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档