thepurposeofthe s f o b b east span retrofit replacement（thepurposeofthe s f o b b东跨改造更换）.docVIP

 1  2 3  4 5  5 Cont. 6 7  8 9 10 11  12 13 14  15 16 17 18 19  19 Cont. 20 21 0 22  23 24 25 26  27 28 29 30 31  32 33 34 35  36 37 38 39 40  41 42 43 City and County of San Francisco — Planning Department Letter dated 11/23/1998 Comment 1 The EIS is consistent with the intent of Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations Section 1502.14(a) in that it explores and evaluates a reasonable range of alternatives. The EIS also is consistent with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in that alternatives that were eliminated from study have been briefly discussed and the reasons for their elimination have been provided (please see response to Comment 3 below). A screening of alternatives, including a No-Build Alternative, was conducted, as summarized in Section 2.7 — Alternatives Considered and Withdrawn. The screening process resulted in the definition of four build alternatives, including the Retrofit Existing Structure Alternative and Replacement Alternatives N-2, N-6, and S-4. This range of alternatives was p