ppt课件-precisionmeasurementsofradiativedecaywidthand.pptVIP

PrimEx-II Data Analysis in Progress * Tagger timing calibration σ =1.5 ns Tagger-HYCAL coincident time Absolute tagging efficiency ( E? = 4.4-5.3 GeV) * Primakoff With constraint Without constraint Preliminary result Γ(?→??) Experiment @ 12 GeV Extract ?-?’mixing angle: Determine Light quark mass ratio: H. Leutwyler Phys. Lett., B378, 313 (1996) Resolve long standing discrepancy between collider and Primakoff measurements: * Q2 * Challenges in the ?→?? Primakoff experiment η larger momentum transfer (coherency, form factors, FSI,…) ? mass is a factor of 4 larger than ?0 and has a smaller cross section larger overlap between Primakoff and hadronic processes; Compared to ?0: Hydrogen 4He targets * * Measurement of Γ(?→??) in Hall D at 12 GeV Incoherent tagged photon beam (~10.5-11.5 GeV) Pair spectrometer and a TAC detector for the photon flux control 30 cm liquid Hydrogen and 4He targets (~3.6% r.l.) Forward Calorimeter (FCAL) for ?→?? decay photons CompCal and FCAL to measure well-known Compton scattering for control of overall systematic uncertainties. Solenoid detectors and forward tracking detectors (for background rejection) CompCal FCAL η Approved Beam Time Days Setup calibration, checkout 2 Tagger efficiency, TAC runs 1 4He target run 30 LH2 target run 40 Empty target run 6 Total 79 * Estimated Error Budget Contributions Estimated Error Photon flux 1.0% Target thickness 0.5% Background subtraction 2.0% Event selection 1.7% Acceptance, misalignment 0.5% Beam energy 0.2% Detection efficiency 0.5% Branching ratio (PDG) 0.66% Total Systematic 3.02% Statistical 1.0% Systematic 3.02% Total 3.2% Systematical uncertainties (added quadratically): Total uncertainty (added quadratically): * Transition Form Factors F(??*→p) (at Low Q2) Direct measurement of slopes Interaction radii:Fγγ*P(Q2)≈1-1/6?r2PQ2  ChPT for large Nc predicts relation between the three slopes. Extraction of Ο(p6) low-energy constant in the chiral Lagr