teljesszuverenitástanulmány- nagy boldizsar(teljesszuverenitastanulmany - nagy boldizsar).docVIP

teljesszuverenitástanulmány- nagy boldizsar(teljesszuverenitastanulmany - nagy boldizsar).doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Warning: This text greatly differs from the final, published one. Only use to identify the ideas, but for quotes use the printed version! Boldizsár Nagy EPHEMERAL SOVEREIGNTYAND THE LONGING FOR THE ABSOLUTE Roadsign* Two topics are the subject of the present study. The first concerns the semantic confusion about sovereignty and is comprised of three parts. The first is an enumeration of the usual -- therefore, easily but seldom obviated -- confusion about the uses of the concept. Then delving a little deeper reveals why international law is incapable to come to terms with the content of sovereignty. According to my proposition, the main reason is indecisiveness on the question whether the origins of the development of an international system should be sought in the individual will of the states, or, on the contrary, states must find their scope of freedom within the restrictions and regulations imposed by international law and relations. This contradiction is irresolvable (but real), therefore, the content of sovereignty remains extremely uncertain, to be always corrected with whatever element was neglected. The third component of the first topic is an illustration offered by surveying Hungarian reality in the form of two questions--“Is or was Hungary sovereign” and “Who constitute the sovereign Hungarian people”--in order to prove that it is almost impossible to speak intelligibly about “sovereignty.” In the second half of the study, after evoking the image of longing for sovereignty as the ultimate absolute, an as if proposition is adopted: namely if it were possible to speak intelligibly about sovereignty as the point of departure for the sake of dialogue. That is followed by an assessment of international legal factors, which are contrary to the dogma of bloc-like, indivisible, total, and unrestricted state sovereignty, with special attention to those phenomena of the past decade that reflect the enhanced role of the international community

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

heti94575 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档