ECONOMIC IMPACTS RESULTING FROM COFIRING BIOMASS FEEDSTOCKS从燃烧的生物质原料造成的经济影响.ppt

ECONOMIC IMPACTS RESULTING FROM COFIRING BIOMASS FEEDSTOCKS从燃烧的生物质原料造成的经济影响.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共29页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Burton English, Jamey Menard, Marie Walsh, and Kim Jensen Professor, Research Associate, Adjunct Professor, and Professor, University of Tennessee. BACKGROUND Electricity from Coal US electricity from coal-firing50% of electricity generated Southeast 60% from coal-firing (DOE/EIA, 2001) Share of air emissions from coal burning 2/3 sulfur dioxide (SO2) 1/3 carbon dioxide (CO2) 1/4 nitrogen oxide (NOx) also adds particulate matter in the air Biomass feedstocks agriculture residues dedicated energy crops forest residues urban wood wastes wood mill wastes have lower emission levels of sulfur or sulfur compounds and can potentially reduce nitrogen oxide emissions BACKGROUND Biomass crops raised for the purposes of energy production is carbon neutral With co-firing, rather than 100 percent biomass use, continuous supply of biomass is not as critical (Demirbas) Credits for offsetting SOx emissions, currently priced at $100 per ton, provide an incentive for co-firing (Comer et al.) Costs of conversion of power plants for co-firing are relatively modest, depends on % percent co-fired Power companies also have potential to obtain marketable value through offsetting CO2 for greenhouse gas mitigation. Replacing coal (a net CO2 emitter) with biomass (a net zero CO2 emitter) offers means to reduce CO2 while maintaining operational coal generating capacity (Comer et al.) BACKGROUND DOE projects that by 2025, biomass electricity production will increase from 38 billion to 78 billion kWhs Electricity from municipal solid waste, including waste combustion and landfill gas, is projected to increase from 22 billion to 34 billion kWhs Factors likely to facilitate this growth include: changing air pollution standards potential benefits to rural economies capacity pressures on solid waste facilities forest fire control policies to limit the amount of understory brush Study Area Power plants studied were associated with Southeastern Electric Reliability Council (SERC) 8

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

chenchend + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档