Pegram PTO Post Grant Counseling AIPLA HomepagePegram PTO授予后咨询还有主页.pptxVIP

下载本文档

3
0
约8.32千字
约 27页
2017-04-10 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

Pegram PTO Post Grant Counseling AIPLA HomepagePegram PTO授予后咨询还有主页.pptx

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Pegram PTO Post Grant Counseling AIPLA HomepagePegram PTO授予后咨询还有主页

Counseling Clients re New USPTO Post Grant Proceedings and Interplay with Litigation Materials Prepared by John B. Pegram Fish Richardson P.C. _____ AIPLA IP Practice in Europe Committee March, 2014 18 Month PTAB Timeline 2 1. Preparation Petitioner Must act quickly if infringement litigation is possible. Detailed petition is required, Claim charts are required, and Expert declarations are common. Patentee Must be prepared in advance, if possible, Little time to prepare responses. Both parties: Page limits on all filings can be a problem. Multiple petitions. 3 2. Threshold Issues for the PetitionerReasonable Likelihood of Success IPR or CBM has been instituted in almost all petitions evaluated In many cases, granted on only a subset of grounds or petitioned claims BUT recently there have been a number of IPR petitions denied in full. PTAB is willing to consider rejections based upon references previously considered by PTO. 4 Redundancy “multiple grounds, which are presented in a redundant manner by a petitioner who makes no meaningful distinction between them, are contrary to the regulatory and statutory mandates, and therefore are not entitled to consideration.” Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co., slip op. CBM2012-00003 (PTAB Oct. 25, 2012) (requiring substantial reduction from 422 grounds of rejection based on 10 references for 20 claims). 5 3. Initial Tactics of the Patentee Two opportunities to respond to the Petition: Preliminary Response Opposing institution of proceeding Main Response Amendment of Claims Claim construction tactics “Broadest reasonable interpretation” for non-expired patents 6 4. Claim Amendments Claim amendments may be offered by Motion to Amend, at the time of the Patentee’s Response, following institution of the proceeding. Only one opportunity to amend, and The number of claims cannot be increased without a showing of good cause. 7 Claim Amendments The Patentee must make a showing of pat