Race To The Top Assessment Program How will English 比赛的最高评估程序如何将英语.pptVIP

Race To The Top Assessment Program How will English 比赛的最高评估程序如何将英语.ppt

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Race To The Top Assessment Program How will English 比赛的最高评估程序如何将英语

Race To The Top Assessment Program: How will English Language Learners Participate? Robert Linquanti Project Director Senior Research Associate RTTT AP Public Meeting Denver, CO December 1, 2009 Purposes of this session Touch on a few key aspects of English Learner status relevant to topic Indicate how RTTT assessment program offers major opportunity for improving assessment (and instruction) of ELLs Suggest what it will take to get there Which ELs are we talking about? Not a monolithic group: More variation within EL than to non-EL US-born vs. 1.5G/Recent Immigrant Time in US school/age-grade on entry L1 literate vs. not (Prior schooling) School attendance/consistency (SIFE) Beginner vs. Intermediate vs. Advanced ELP Overall composite vs. subskills Socio-cultural/dialectical differences How does one get into/out of EL category? Home language survey identifies language minority status, triggers initial ELP assessment ELP assessment identifies EL vs. initially fluent (true bilingual/English dominant) What gets you into EL status may be very different from what gets you out of it Multiple criteria: ELP, academics, non-cognitive Skimming Effect and the Redesignation Dilemma Successful ELs typically exit EL cohort, leaving lower-performing and newly arrived Those remaining not meeting criteria for exit: which criteria? Better performing by definition, exited ELs may have ongoing linguistic, academic needs Suggests continuum of progress, needs and supports (vs. binary categories, funding) Educators Have a Dual Obligation to English Learners Provide meaningful access to grade-level academic content via appropriate instruction Develop students’ academic English language proficiency (Lau v. Nichols; Casta?eda v. Pickard; NCLB) Simultaneous not sequential! Academic language proficiency ESL/ELD necessary but not sufficient for academic success Many academic tasks mediated by language Every teacher must model and teach using the language of their dis

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

118books + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档