THE JOHNSON AZIGA CASE A LANDMARK CASE约翰逊案的被告之一.pptVIP

THE JOHNSON AZIGA CASE: A LANDMARK CASE Johnson Aziga Timeline Diagnosed with HIV in 1996 Received counselling and seemed to know his limitations Around 2000, learned that he was indulging in unprotected sex Was directed to attend counselling, wear condoms and disclose HIV status to partners Aziga Timeline cont. Officials could have detained him under section 102 of Health Promotion and Protection Act Police were called and monitored Aziga Learned that Aziga may have had sex with 20 women 10 counts of aggravated sexual assault, and one ground of attempted aggravated sexual assault, two first degree murder counts KEY DEBATE QUESTIONS 1. Is referring to spreading HIV as a “slow acting poison” an accurate statement? Explain. KEY DEBATE QUESTION #2 Dangerous offenders are those offenders who cannot apply for parole after 25 years and will remain in jail until they die. Is Aziga a dangerous offender in your opinion? Explain your answer. Aggravated Assault and Sexual Assault Laws 268. (1) Every one commits an aggravated assault who wounds, maims, disfigures or endangers the life of the complainant. Punishment (2) Every one who commits an aggravated assault is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years. 273. (1) Every one commits an aggravated sexual assault who, in committing a sexual assault, wounds, maims, disfigures or endangers the life of the complainant. ? Meaning of consent 273.1 (1) Subject to subsection (2) and subsection 265(3), consent means, for the purposes of sections 271, 272 and 273, the voluntary agreement of the complainant to engage in the sexual activity in question KEY DEBATE QUESTION #3 Is it right to classify deliberately spreading HIV as aggravated sexual assault if the person does not die? Explain your answer. KEY DEBATE QUESTION #4 Is it right classify deliberately spreading HIV as first degree murder, if the person ends up dying from HIV related incidents? Explain your answ