艾普拉唑联合莫沙比利治疗反流性食管炎80例分析.docVIP

艾普拉唑联合莫沙比利治疗反流性食管炎80例分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
艾普拉唑联合莫沙比利治疗反流性食管炎80例分析.doc

艾普拉唑联合莫沙比利治疗反流性食管炎80例分析   [摘要]目的 探讨艾普拉唑联合莫沙必利治疗反流性食管炎的临床效果。方法 选取2015年12月~2016年6月在我院就诊治疗的80例反流性食管炎患者作为观察组,给予艾普拉唑联合莫沙必利治疗。选取同期在我院就诊治疗的80例反流性食管炎患者作为对照组,给予奥美拉唑联合莫沙必利治疗,比较两组的治疗效果。结果 观察组的总有效率为97.5%,显著高于对照组的85.0%,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组治疗后的胸骨后烧灼感、反酸、胸骨后疼痛等症状评分显著低于治疗前,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组治疗后的胸骨后烧灼感、反酸、胸骨后疼痛等症状评分显著低于对照组治疗后,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组的胸骨后烧灼感、反酸、胸骨后疼痛等症状缓解时间显著短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组的并发症均未影响治疗,所有患者均康复,安全性高。结论 艾普拉唑联合莫沙必利治疗反流性食管炎临床效果确切,能促进患者恢复,临床应用价值显著。   [关键词]艾普拉唑;莫沙必利;联合;反流性食管炎   [中图分类号] R571 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2016)10(b)-0117-03   [Abstract]Objective To explore the clinical effect of Ilaprazole combined with Mosapride in the treatment of reflux esophagitis.Methods 80 cases of reflux esophagitis from December 2015 to June 2016 in our hospital were selected as the observation group,and who were treated with Ilaprazole combined with and Mosapride.80 cases of reflux esophagitis in the same period in our hospital were selected as the control group,and who were treated with Omeprazole combined with Mosapride.The treatment effect in the two groups was compared.Results The total effective rate of the observation group was 97.5%,which was higher than 85.0% of the control group,with significant difference (P0.05).The symptoms score of retrosternal burning sensation,acid regurgitation,chest pain and others after treatment in the two groups was lower than that before treatment,with significant difference (P0.05).The symptoms score of retrosternal burning sensation,acid regurgitation,chest pain and others after treatment in the observation group was lower than that in the control group after treatment,with significant difference (P0.05).The symptom relief time of retrosternal burning sensation,acid regurgitation,chest pain and others in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group,with significant difference (P0.05).The complications of the two groups did not affect the treatment,all patients were recovered,with high safety.Conclusion Ilaprazole comb

文档评论(0)

yingzhiguo + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:5243141323000000

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档