胆囊结石腹腔镜术后疼痛护理中循证护理应用效果探讨.docVIP

胆囊结石腹腔镜术后疼痛护理中循证护理应用效果探讨.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
胆囊结石腹腔镜术后疼痛护理中循证护理应用效果探讨.doc

胆囊结石腹腔镜术后疼痛护理中循证护理应用效果探讨   [摘要] 目的 探究循证护理在胆囊结石患者经腹腔镜手术治疗之后出现疼痛的护理效果。方法 随机选取2014年1月―2015年1月该院收治的100例通过腹腔镜手术治疗的胆囊结石患者,将这100例胆囊结石患者随机分为实验组以及对照组。实验组胆囊结石患者在腹腔镜手术之后给予循证护理,对照组胆囊结石患者在腹腔镜手术之后给予常规的护理,对实验组以及对照组经腹腔镜手术治疗的胆囊结石患者在术后经不同护理方法的效果进行比较分析。结果 实验组和对照组患者术后疼痛原因主要为创口疼痛(100%和100%)、牵涉疼痛(24.00%和26.00%)、发生胆漏(4.00%和4.00%),组间差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。实验组疼痛程度评分明显低于对照组,实验组在腹腔镜术后疼痛时间小于12 h的例数(42.00%)与对照组(48.00%)相比差异无统计学意义(P0.05),实验组患者在腹腔镜手术之后疼痛时间在12~14 h之间的例数(54.00%)明显高于对照组患者(36.00%),差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 对胆囊结石患者经腹腔镜手术治疗之后,加以循证护理,可以明显的减少患者在手术之后的疼痛程度以及疼痛时间,提高胆囊结石患者治疗的效果。   [关键词] 胆囊结石;腹腔镜;疼痛;循证护理   [中图分类号] R473.6 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2015)09(c)-0124-03   [Abstract] Objective To explore the effect of evidence-based nursing on the postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for cholelithiasis. Methods 100 cases underwent laparoscopic surgery for cholelithiasis in our hospital from January 2014 to January 2015 were selected as the subjects and randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group. After surgery, patients in the experimental group were given evidence-based nursing, and those in the control group were given conventional nursing. And the nursing efficacy of the two groups was analyzed and compared. Results Wound pain, referred pain and bile leakage were the main reasons that caused postoperative pain in both groups. 100% of the patients in the experimental group and control group had wound pain, 24.00% of the patients in the experimental group and 26.00% of the patients in the control group had referred pain, 4.00% of the patients in the experimental group and control group had bile leakage, the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant(P0.05). The VAS scores were much lower in the experimental group than in the control group. 42.00% of the patients in the experimental group and 48.00% of the patients in the control group had postoperative pain lasting for less than 12h, the difference between the two groups was no

文档评论(0)

yingzhiguo + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:5243141323000000

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档