- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
锁定钢板治疗Pilon骨折的临床效果.doc
锁定钢板治疗Pilon骨折的临床效果
[摘要] 目的 研究锁定钢板治疗Pilon骨折的临床效果,对临床治疗Pilon骨折提供方法参考。 方法 选取我院骨科2013年1月~2014年9月收治的52例Pilon骨折患者,随机分为锁定钢板组和解剖钢板组各26例,比较两组患者的围术期指标、复位放射学评价指标、功能恢复指标的差异。 结果 锁定钢板组的手术时间(48.6±10.5)min、术中出血量(126.3±18.5)ml、术后住院时间(17.5±4.3)d、骨折愈合时间(3.52±0.61)个月均显著低于解剖钢板组(P0.05)。锁定钢板组的踝关节优良率88.46%与解剖钢板组92.31%比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。锁定钢板组的并发症率11.54%与解剖钢板组的23.08%比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 锁定钢板治疗Pilon骨折较解剖钢板可以显著缩短手术时间、住院时间、术后骨折愈合时间,治疗效果与解剖钢板相当。
[关键词] Pilon骨折;锁定钢板;解剖钢板;临床效果
[中图分类号] R683.42 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2016)05(a)-0081-04
Clinical effects of locking plate in treating Pilon fracture
ZHAO Zhan-wen
The Second Department of Orthopaedics,Luoyang New District Peoples Hospital,Luoyang 471023,China
[Abstract] Objective To study the clinical effects of locking plate in treating Pilon fracture and to provide reference for clinical treatment of Pilon fracture. Methods 52 Pilon fracture patients from Orthopedics Department of Luoyang new District Peoples Hospital from January 2013 to september 2014 were selected.Patients were randomly divided into locking plate group and anatomical plate group,each group was 26 cases.The difference of perioperative indicator,reset radiological evaluation index and functional recovery index in two groups were compared. Results The operation time,bleeding during operation,postoperative hospital stay and fracture recovery time in locking plate group was respectively (48.6±10.5)min,(126.3±18.5)ml,(17.5±4.3)d and (3.52±0.61)months,which was lower than that of anatomical plate group (P0.05).The excellence rate of ankle in locking plate group was 88.46%,which was 92.31% in anatomical plate group,and the difference had no statistical significance (P0.05).The incidence rate of complications in locking plate group was 11.54%,which was 23.08% in anatomical plate group,and the difference had no statistical significance (P0.05). Conclusion Comparing with anatomical plate,locking plate in treating Pilon fracture decreases the operation time,hospita
文档评论(0)