西方语言学流派--系统功能语法剖析.ppt

Systemic-functional grammar VS Traditional grammar 印睿 HBUT yinrui.2014@ 1. Systemic functional linguistics views language as a system of choices. 2. Language and context are closely interrelated. 3. Context of situation (Register) consists of three parameters: Field, Tenor and Mode, which reflects three metafunctions of language: ideational, interpersonal and textual. 4. Context of culture (Genre) has three dimensions: the register configuration, the text’s staged or schematic structure, the realization patterns in the text. The main content of SFG The differences between traditional grammar and SFG (Gerot Wignell, 1994) Traditional Systemic-functional ?Researching method prescriptive grammar descriptive grammar Definitions of grammar mainly concerned with syntax (+ some morphology) lexicogrammar – no distinction between lexis and grammar. Both are meaning-creating. Areas covered text sentence clause phrase word morpheme the whole communicative event: ideational, interpersonal and textual functions. Lexicogrammar Views static dynamic Systemic-functional grammar VS Transformational-generative grammar Avram Noam Chomsky 1928年12月7日－ Michael Alexander Kirkwood Halliday 1925年4月13日－ Similarities *They are both schools of modern linguistics. *They both treasure synchronic description. *They both made similar concepts like langue and parole. *Their theories both undergo several stages. TGG SFG Mentalist view of language, i.e. language exists in the mind Social view of language, i.e. language exists in society as it is used by people in different social contexts Studying the structures of language and how they are produced is to study how the mind works to produce and process language Studying language i