From fair in war to commercial tire of fraud.docVIP

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 29 From ‘fair in war’ to ‘commercial tire of fraud’ Art of War in the so-called ‘fair in war’ is: ‘All warfare is deception. ‘Advocate before the war to hide their strength, resulting in erroneous estimates of the enemy, and then’ the enemy is unprepared, by surprise. ‘Of its tips: To avoid the dashing spirit of the enemy and the enemy is apathy, disrupt the enemy morale, so that the enemy weighed down with work, and then take advantage of Yat pending labor, that is, the so-called virtual avoid the hit, multi-strategies such as the use of a smoke. Confuse the enemy, to protect themselves, and then succeed in one fell swoop. From ‘fair in war’ to ‘commercial tire of fraud’ whether there is any great difference? Its essence is not the same? Soldiers fighting war with business, perhaps in the means and methods, there are many similarities, but its nature is different, the two are not the same thing. War is to destroy the enemy soldier’s life, plundering the wealth of the enemy targeted; while commercial fighting is based on more trading opportunities, more targeted turnover; if we are more the atmosphere, then, and even can achieve win-win situation or a win-win situation. By the nature of warfare and military warfare difference is that the former is to use wealth in gambling, which is the Yongming in gambling. ‘Fair in war’, ‘soldiers to fraud legislation’, these views reveal that soldiers fighting strategy point is do not speak good faith, full use of fraudulent means. Although the commercial realities of war there are a lot of unscrupulous and mortal cases of fraud exists, but after all not the mainstream, from the business to analyze the nature of war should be: Business war needs integrity, credibility, and not the use of fraudulent means to it. As a result, war strategy is the core business ‘credit’. The essence of commercial warfare strategy and brand building corporate credit and build. Business if you want to achieve in the short