不同方案治疗ⅢA型前列腺炎成本—效果分析.pdfVIP

第 14 卷第 17 期·总第 241期 2016 年 9 月·上半月刊 ②fRfE雪黯军费教育 出叮 不同方案治疗 IIIA 型前列腺炎成本一效果分析 闰德、峰1 黄金叶2 张力2* (1 江苏省连云港市赣榆区人民医院药学部，赣榆 222100 ; 2 江苏省连云港市赣榆区人民医院泌尿外科，赣榆 222100) 摘 要:目的对4种不同方案治疗I1IA型前列腺炎的成本一效果进行分析对比，以选择最佳治疗方案。方法回顾性分析 2014年6月一2015年6月 198例 III型前列腺炎的临床资料，根据用药不同将患者分为4i且，在应用左氧氟沙皇、坦洛新的基础 上， A纽给予普适泰治疗， 8纽给予痕闭舒治疗 ， ci且给予宁泌泰治疗， D纽予以泽桂瘫爽治疗，均连续治疗 1 月，采用成本 一效果分析法对4种方案进行分析评价。结果 4纽患者的总有效率比较元统计学差异(P0.05); 成本一效果比分别为640.91 、 614.89 、 575.93和516.14，其中D组成本一效果比最低;敏感度分析显示D纽优于其他.3组。结论从药物经济学来说，泽桂瘫 爽联合左氧氟沙星、坦洛新方案最优。 关键词: I1IA型前列腺炎;成本一效果分析;药物经济学 doi:l0.3969/j .issn.1672-2779.2016.17.015 文章编号 :1672-2779(2016)-17-0035-03 Analysis on the C帽t-Eff，自由en.路 0 Different Trea臼nent Programs in 由e Treatment of 10 A Chronic Prostati自 YAN Defeng, HUANG Jinye 2 , ZHANG LF (1. Department ofPharmaceutical Sciences, Lianyungang City Ganyu District Peoples Hospital, Jiangsu, Gan归 222100， China; 2. Department ofUrinary Surgery, Lianyungang City Ganyu Dis位ict Peoples Hospital, Jiangsu, Gan归 222100， China) Abstract: Objective To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of four combination treatment programs in the treatment of the m A chronic prostatitis (m A-CP) so as to choose the optimal treatment program. Methods The data of 198 patients with m A-CP who were treated in the hospital from June 2014 to June 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different combination treatment programs, 198 cases with m A-CP were divided into four groups. On the basis of the use of levofloxacin and tamsulosin, cases in group A, B, C and D were treated with Prostat, Longbishu Capsule, Ningmitai Capsule and Zegui Longshuang, respectively. AIl patients were consecutively treated for 1 month. The cost-effectiveness analysis was perfo口ned to evaluate the four treatment programs. Results There was no significant difference on the total effective rate between four groups. The cost-effectiveness ratio was 640.91 , 614.89, 575.93 and 516.14, respectively. Sensitivity analysis showed that Zegui Longshuang group was better than ot