网站大量收购闲置独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

False Hopes, Unwarranted Fears The Trouble with Medical News Stories 英文参考文献.docVIP

False Hopes, Unwarranted Fears The Trouble with Medical News Stories 英文参考文献.doc

  1. 1、本文档共3页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
False Hopes, Unwarranted Fears The Trouble with Medical News Stories 英文参考文献

Editorial False Hopes, Unwarranted Fears: The Trouble with Medical News Stories The PLoS Medicine Editors O n April 26, 2007, ABC World News, the American Broadcasting Corporation’s Medicine on the effects of stopping or continuing antipsychotic drugs in Alzheimer disease [5], and Behind the Headlines posted a detailed assessment of the science behind the coverage [6]. HealthNewsR uses a “often” or “nearly always” dif?cult [8]. While there are certainly studies in specialist medical journals that will be dif?cult for many people to grasp, nevertheless there may be some value in establishing a core set of scienti?c competencies for all health reporters. Indeed, the Association of Health Care Journalists’ Statement of Principles states that health reporters should “understand the process of medical research in order to report accurately” (/ secondarydetails.php?id=56). There is also a broader context ?agship television news program, aired a “good news” story about a new test for prostate cancer [1]. Against a background of a dramatic graphic showing that 1.6 million American men undergo prostate biopsy each year, the presenter announced: “Researchers at Johns Hopkins say they have developed a more accurate blood screening test.” The story was based on a new study examining the performance of early prostate cancer antigen-2 as a serum marker for prostate cancer [2]. Unfortunately, ABC failed to disclose one crucial fact: the principal investigator of this study receives a share of the royalty sales of the test and is a paid consultant to the test’s manufacturer [3]. This failure was one of a litany of weaknesses in the story. There was no discussion, for example, of the scienti?c evidence showing that the test was “more accurate” than existing screening tests or of the uncertain bene?ts and proven harms of prostate cancer screening. In this month’s PLoS Medicine, Gary Schwitzer of the University of Minnesota School of Journalism and Mass Communication highlights thi

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

sheppha + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:5134022301000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档