Sensitivity of Coastal Flood Risk Assessments to Digital Elevation Models 英文参考文献.docVIP

Water 2012, 4, 568-579; doi:10.3390/w4030568 OPEN ACCESS water ISSN 2073-4441 /journal/water Article Sensitivity of Coastal Flood Risk Assessments to Digital Elevation Models Bas van de Sande 1*, Joost Lansen 2 and Claartje Hoyng 2 1 Royal HaskoningDHV, Barbarossastraat 35 6522 DK Nijmegen, The Netherlands 2 Royal HaskoningDHV, George Hintzenweg 85 3068 AX Rotterdam, The Netherlands; E-Mails: joost.lansen@ (J.L.); claartje.hoyng@ (C.H.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: bas.van.de.sande@; Tel.: +31-6-1359-1995; Fax: +31-24-323-9346. Received: 14 June 2012; in revised form: 14 July 2012 / Accepted: 16 July 2012 / Published: 27 July 2012 Abstract: Most coastal flood risk studies make use of a Digital Elevation Model (DEM) in addition to a projected flood water level in order to estimate the flood inundation and associated damages to property and livelihoods. The resolution and accuracy of a DEM are critical in a flood risk assessment, as land elevation largely determines whether a location will be flooded or will remain dry during a flood event. Especially in low lying deltaic areas, the land elevation variation is usually in the order of only a few decimeters, and an offset of various decimeters in the elevation data has a significant impact on the accuracy of the risk assessment. Publicly available DEMs are often used in studies for coastal flood risk assessments. The accuracy of these datasets is relatively low, in the order of meters, and is especially low in comparison to the level of accuracy required for a flood risk assessment in a deltaic area. For a coastal zone area in Nigeria (Lagos State) an accurate LiDAR DEM dataset was adopted as ground truth concerning terrain elevation. In the case study, the LiDAR DEM was compared to various publicly available DEMs. The coastal flood risk assessment using various publicly available DEMs was compared to a flood risk